STLFX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund (STLFX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
STLFX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 29, 2008. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
STLFX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
STLFX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STLFX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund | -3.93% | 20.03% | 5.73% | 22.31% | -18.73% | 18.12% | 14.82% | 26.48% | -8.22% | 21.73% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STLFX achieves a -3.93% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, STLFX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 9.68%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
STLFX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -8.91%
- YTD
- -3.93%
- 6M
- -1.66%
- 1Y
- 16.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STLFX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
STLFX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
STLFX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
STLFX
FASGX
STLFX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund (STLFX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STLFX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 1.21 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.73 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.26 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 1.55 | -0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.79 | 6.89 | -1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STLFX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.21 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.53 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.70 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.60 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between STLFX and FASGX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
STLFX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
STLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STLFX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund | 6.45% | 6.20% | 1.86% | 2.91% | 2.51% | 16.88% | 2.27% | 6.09% | 15.73% | 5.87% | 2.00% | 9.21% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
STLFX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STLFX drawdown since its inception was -50.35%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLFX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| STLFX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.35% | -47.35% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.93% | -9.07% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | -23.54% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.48% | -27.20% | -7.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.45% | -7.95% | -1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.83% | -6.74% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 2.04% | +0.48% |
Volatility
STLFX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund (STLFX) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 4.57%. This indicates that STLFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| STLFX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 4.57% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.15% | 7.78% | +2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.81% | 12.82% | +4.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 12.14% | +4.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 12.56% | +3.77% |