STLFX vs. ASFYX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund (STLFX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX).
STLFX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 29, 2008. ASFYX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jul 30, 2010.
Performance
STLFX vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
STLFX vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STLFX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund | -3.93% | 20.03% | 5.73% | 22.31% | -18.73% | 18.12% | 14.82% | 26.48% | -8.22% | 21.73% |
ASFYX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y | 6.59% | -9.67% | -3.22% | -10.33% | 35.67% | 3.52% | 13.59% | 8.99% | -12.59% | 6.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STLFX achieves a -3.93% return, which is significantly lower than ASFYX's 6.59% return. Over the past 10 years, STLFX has outperformed ASFYX with an annualized return of 9.68%, while ASFYX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.87% annualized return.
STLFX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -8.91%
- YTD
- -3.93%
- 6M
- -1.66%
- 1Y
- 16.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
ASFYX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 3.41%
- 3Y*
- -2.89%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- 1.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STLFX vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
STLFX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
STLFX vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank
STLFX
ASFYX
STLFX vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund (STLFX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STLFX | ASFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 0.18 | +0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 0.30 | +1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.04 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 0.10 | +1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.79 | 0.16 | +5.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STLFX | ASFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.18 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.17 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.15 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.31 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between STLFX and ASFYX is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
STLFX vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison
STLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, more than ASFYX's 1.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STLFX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund | 6.45% | 6.20% | 1.86% | 2.91% | 2.51% | 16.88% | 2.27% | 6.09% | 15.73% | 5.87% | 2.00% | 9.21% |
ASFYX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y | 1.43% | 1.52% | 1.46% | 0.99% | 32.48% | 6.07% | 3.40% | 5.51% | 1.30% | 0.07% | 0.01% | 5.06% |
Drawdowns
STLFX vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STLFX drawdown since its inception was -50.35%, which is greater than ASFYX's maximum drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLFX and ASFYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| STLFX | ASFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.35% | -36.43% | -13.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.93% | -13.51% | +1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | -36.43% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.48% | -36.43% | +1.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.45% | -24.37% | +14.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.83% | -13.09% | +6.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 8.72% | -6.20% |
Volatility
STLFX vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund (STLFX) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) at 3.86%. This indicates that STLFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| STLFX | ASFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 3.86% | +1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.15% | 10.01% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.81% | 13.02% | +4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 13.68% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 12.68% | +3.65% |