STK vs. RLTY

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

STK (Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Aberdeen, while RLTY (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, STK returned 30.83%/yr vs 14.92%/yr for RLTY. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

STK vs. RLTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STK achieves a 44.26% return, which is significantly higher than RLTY's 11.56% return.

STK

• 1D: 2.32%
• 1M: 4.91%
• YTD: 44.26%
• 6M: 47.42%
• 1Y: 90.64%
• 3Y*: 30.83%
• 5Y*: 19.37%
• 10Y*: 23.66%

RLTY

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 3.00%
• YTD: 11.56%
• 6M: 12.17%
• 1Y: 14.01%
• 3Y*: 14.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STK vs. RLTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund	44.26%	24.85%	17.74%	46.60%	-16.70%
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund	11.56%	8.56%	15.40%	14.05%	-28.45%

Correlation

The correlation between STK and RLTY is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between STK and RLTY has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

STK vs. RLTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STK

STK Risk / Return Rank: 94
STK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
STK Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
STK Omega Ratio Rank: 89
STK Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
STK Martin Ratio Rank: 97

RLTY

RLTY Risk / Return Rank: 69
RLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
RLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
RLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STK vs. RLTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STK	RLTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.44	1.02	+2.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.88	1.53	+2.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.18	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.57	1.18	+4.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.83	3.92	+20.91

STK vs. RLTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STK Sharpe Ratio is 3.44, which is higher than the RLTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STK and RLTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STK vs. RLTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STK drawdown since its inception was -41.74%, which is greater than RLTY's maximum drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STK and RLTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	STK	RLTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.74%	-35.44%	-6.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.05%	-11.40%	-4.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.59%	-20.81%	-5.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.90%	-0.19%	-9.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.41%	-13.67%	+6.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	3.43%	+0.17%

Volatility

STK vs. RLTY - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) has a higher volatility of 15.03% compared to Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) at 4.10%. This indicates that STK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STK	RLTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.03%	4.10%	+10.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.75%	10.11%	+12.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.01%	13.18%	+12.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.66%	22.69%	+2.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.40%	22.69%	+3.71%

Dividends

STK vs. RLTY - Dividend Comparison

STK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, less than RLTY's 8.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund	8.40%	8.98%	8.93%	9.18%	6.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund	5.23%	7.38%	16.02%	6.70%	12.62%	8.48%	6.79%	7.86%	14.88%	11.82%	9.87%	10.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STK and RLTY in my portfolio?

STK and RLTY have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STK or RLTY?

STK has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to RLTY (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STK dropped -41.74% vs RLTY's -35.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.