RLTY vs. BXSL
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RLTY or BXSL.
Key characteristics
| RLTY | BXSL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 23.13% | 20.40% |
| 1Y Return | 40.53% | 23.24% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.99 | 1.66 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.70 | 2.30 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.35 | 1.29 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.47 | 2.24 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.84 | 7.05 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.86% | 3.22% |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.04% | 13.65% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.45% | -36.85% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.11% | -2.19% |
Fundamentals
| RLTY | BXSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $265.55M | $6.37B |
| EPS | $1.02 | $3.87 |
| PE Ratio | 15.57 | 7.98 |
Correlation
The correlation between RLTY and BXSL is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
RLTY vs. BXSL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, RLTY achieves a 23.13% return, which is significantly higher than BXSL's 20.40% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RLTY vs. BXSL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RLTY vs. BXSL - Dividend Comparison
RLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.01%, less than BXSL's 9.98% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund | 8.31% | 9.18% | 6.94% | 0.00% |
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | 9.98% | 10.64% | 13.02% | 1.56% |
Drawdowns
RLTY vs. BXSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLTY drawdown since its inception was -35.45%, roughly equal to the maximum BXSL drawdown of -36.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLTY and BXSL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RLTY vs. BXSL - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) at 4.60%. This indicates that RLTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BXSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
RLTY vs. BXSL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities