RLTY vs. BXSL

In the year-to-date period, RLTY achieves a 5.88% return, which is significantly higher than BXSL's -3.68% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RLTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the BXSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLTY and BXSL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.48%, less than BXSL's 9.90% yield.

The maximum RLTY drawdown since its inception was -35.45%, smaller than the maximum BXSL drawdown of -41.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLTY and BXSL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) is 4.93%, while Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that RLTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BXSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.