RLTY vs. BXSL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL).

Performance

RLTY vs. BXSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RLTY vs. BXSL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund	1.08%	8.56%	15.40%	14.05%	-27.73%
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	-7.02%	-9.36%	29.02%	37.82%	-13.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLTY achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than BXSL's -7.02% return.

RLTY

• 1D: 2.61%
• 1M: -7.67%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: -0.60%
• 1Y: 3.45%
• 3Y*: 12.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BXSL

• 1D: 2.91%
• 1M: 2.52%
• YTD: -7.02%
• 6M: -3.35%
• 1Y: -17.82%
• 3Y*: 9.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RLTY vs. BXSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLTY

RLTY Risk / Return Rank: 47
RLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
RLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
RLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 40
RLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
RLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 53

BXSL

BXSL Risk / Return Rank: 14
BXSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BXSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
BXSL Omega Ratio Rank: 13
BXSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
BXSL Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLTY vs. BXSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RLTY	BXSL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	-0.76	+0.96
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.39	-0.97	+1.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	0.88	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	-0.74	+1.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.06	-1.27	+2.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RLTY vs. BXSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the BXSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLTY and BXSL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RLTY	BXSL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21	-0.76	+0.96
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.32	-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between RLTY and BXSL is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RLTY vs. BXSL - Dividend Comparison

RLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.08%, less than BXSL's 13.00% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund	9.08%	8.98%	8.93%	9.18%	6.94%	0.00%
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	13.00%	11.70%	9.53%	10.64%	13.02%	1.56%

Drawdowns

RLTY vs. BXSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLTY drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, roughly equal to the maximum BXSL drawdown of -36.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLTY and BXSL.

Drawdown Indicators

	RLTY	BXSL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.44%	-36.80%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.88%	-23.47%	+9.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.25%	-21.07%	+12.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.27%	-13.88%	-0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.90%	13.62%	-9.72%

Volatility

RLTY vs. BXSL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) is 5.50%, while Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that RLTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BXSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RLTY	BXSL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.50%	7.42%	-1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.62%	15.51%	-5.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.74%	23.61%	-6.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.04%	23.77%	-0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.04%	23.77%	-0.73%

Financials