STK vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ).
STK is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Nov 25, 2009. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999.
Performance
STK vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
STK vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund | 4.31% | 24.85% | 17.74% | 46.60% | -30.36% | 48.63% | 25.39% | 52.73% | -14.91% | 33.52% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | -5.93% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STK achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's -5.93% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with STK having a 19.03% annualized return and QQQ not far behind at 18.85%.
STK
- 1D
- 5.54%
- 1M
- -6.23%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- 1Y
- 46.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.46%
- 10Y*
- 19.03%
QQQ
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -3.62%
- 1Y
- 23.68%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.88%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STK vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
STK has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
STK vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
STK
QQQ
STK vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STK | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 1.05 | +0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 1.63 | +0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.23 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 1.88 | +1.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 6.95 | +5.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STK | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.05 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.58 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.85 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.37 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between STK and QQQ is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
STK vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
STK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund | 7.16% | 7.38% | 16.02% | 6.70% | 12.62% | 8.48% | 6.79% | 7.86% | 14.88% | 11.82% | 9.87% | 10.32% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Drawdowns
STK vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STK drawdown since its inception was -41.74%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STK and QQQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| STK | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.74% | -82.97% | +41.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -12.62% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.27% | -35.12% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.74% | -35.12% | -6.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.51% | -8.98% | +1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -32.99% | +25.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 3.41% | +0.26% |
Volatility
STK vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.51%. This indicates that STK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| STK | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.65% | 6.51% | +3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.90% | 12.77% | +5.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.65% | 22.67% | +2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.83% | 22.39% | +2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 22.25% | +3.66% |