RLTY vs. RQI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI).

Performance

RLTY vs. RQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RLTY vs. RQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund	1.08%	8.56%	15.40%	14.05%	-27.73%
RQI Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund	7.83%	2.07%	8.04%	15.74%	-18.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLTY achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than RQI's 7.83% return.

RLTY

• 1D: 2.61%
• 1M: -7.67%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: -0.60%
• 1Y: 3.45%
• 3Y*: 12.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RQI

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -8.83%
• YTD: 7.83%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: 5.24%
• 3Y*: 9.23%
• 5Y*: 5.14%
• 10Y*: 7.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RLTY vs. RQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLTY

RLTY Risk / Return Rank: 47
RLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
RLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
RLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 40
RLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
RLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 53

RQI

RQI Risk / Return Rank: 50
RQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
RQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RQI Omega Ratio Rank: 43
RQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
RQI Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLTY vs. RQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RLTY	RQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	0.29	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.39	0.50	-0.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.07	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	0.41	-0.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.06	1.31	-0.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RLTY vs. RQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is comparable to the RQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLTY and RQI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RLTY	RQI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21	0.29	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.27	-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between RLTY and RQI is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RLTY vs. RQI - Dividend Comparison

RLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.08%, less than RQI's 9.29% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund	9.08%	8.98%	8.93%	9.18%	6.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RQI Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund	9.29%	9.54%	7.84%	7.84%	10.41%	5.27%	7.74%	6.79%	9.27%	7.59%	7.86%	7.86%

Drawdowns

RLTY vs. RQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLTY drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, smaller than the maximum RQI drawdown of -91.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLTY and RQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	RLTY	RQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.44%	-91.59%	+56.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.88%	-14.25%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.25%	-9.10%	+0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.27%	-18.04%	+3.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.90%	4.46%	-0.56%

Volatility

RLTY vs. RQI - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) have volatilities of 5.50% and 5.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RLTY	RQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.50%	5.53%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.62%	11.44%	-1.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.74%	18.37%	-1.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.04%	23.06%	-0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.04%	26.94%	-3.90%

Financials