RLTY vs. RQI

In the year-to-date period, RLTY achieves a 7.42% return, which is significantly higher than RQI's 4.84% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RLTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the RQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLTY and RQI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.28%, more than RQI's 8.32% yield.

The maximum RLTY drawdown since its inception was -35.45%, smaller than the maximum RQI drawdown of -91.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLTY and RQI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) have volatilities of 4.54% and 4.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.