PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RLTY vs. RQI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RLTY and RQI is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

RLTY vs. RQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.01%
0.50%
RLTY
RQI

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RLTY:

1.16

RQI:

1.06

Sortino Ratio

RLTY:

1.59

RQI:

1.49

Omega Ratio

RLTY:

1.21

RQI:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

RLTY:

1.04

RQI:

0.70

Martin Ratio

RLTY:

3.57

RQI:

3.43

Ulcer Index

RLTY:

6.35%

RQI:

5.77%

Daily Std Dev

RLTY:

19.63%

RQI:

18.64%

Max Drawdown

RLTY:

-35.45%

RQI:

-91.64%

Current Drawdown

RLTY:

-7.06%

RQI:

-7.98%

Fundamentals

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLTY achieves a 7.92% return, which is significantly higher than RQI's 6.74% return.


RLTY

YTD

7.92%

1M

2.20%

6M

4.01%

1Y

23.41%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

RQI

YTD

6.74%

1M

1.41%

6M

0.50%

1Y

18.95%

5Y*

6.13%

10Y*

8.98%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RLTY vs. RQI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLTY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RLTY is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RLTY is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RLTY is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RLTY is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RLTY is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RLTY is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

RQI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RQI is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RQI is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RQI is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RQI is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RQI is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RQI is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RLTY vs. RQI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RLTY, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.001.161.06
The chart of Sortino ratio for RLTY, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.591.49
The chart of Omega ratio for RLTY, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.211.19
The chart of Calmar ratio for RLTY, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.040.80
The chart of Martin ratio for RLTY, currently valued at 3.57, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.003.573.43
RLTY
RQI

The current RLTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the RQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLTY and RQI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.16
1.06
RLTY
RQI

Dividends

RLTY vs. RQI - Dividend Comparison

RLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.40%, more than RQI's 7.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RLTY
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund
8.40%8.93%9.18%6.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RQI
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund
7.44%7.84%7.84%10.41%5.27%7.74%6.79%9.27%7.59%7.86%7.86%6.23%

Drawdowns

RLTY vs. RQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLTY drawdown since its inception was -35.45%, smaller than the maximum RQI drawdown of -91.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLTY and RQI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-7.06%
-7.13%
RLTY
RQI

Volatility

RLTY vs. RQI - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) at 3.27%. This indicates that RLTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.14%
3.27%
RLTY
RQI

Financials

RLTY vs. RQI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab