PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLTY vs. SCHH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RLTY vs. SCHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLTY achieves a 13.69% return, which is significantly lower than SCHH's 17.68% return.


RLTY

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.75%
6M
10.52%
YTD
13.69%
1Y
13.10%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.45%

SCHH

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.87%
6M
14.82%
YTD
17.68%
1Y
19.86%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
3.73%
ALL TIME*
7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$847.93K$984.15K$858.81K
$134.76M$145.46M$140.74M

RLTY vs. SCHH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RLTY
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund
13.69%8.56%15.40%14.05%-28.45%
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
17.68%2.20%4.99%11.18%-13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between RLTY and SCHH is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.71

The correlation between RLTY and SCHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLTY vs. SCHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RLTY
RLTY Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
RLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHH
SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RLTY vs. SCHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RLTYSCHHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.25

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

2.37

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.93

7.96

-4.03

RLTY vs. SCHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the SCHH Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLTY and SCHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RLTY vs. SCHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLTY drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, smaller than the maximum SCHH drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLTY and SCHH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLTYSCHHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.44%

-44.22%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-8.28%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.81%

-17.76%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-2.33%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-9.36%

-3.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

2.47%

+0.95%

Volatility

RLTY vs. SCHH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) is 3.27%, while Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that RLTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLTYSCHHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

4.56%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

10.96%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.08%

13.92%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.45%

18.79%

+3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.45%

21.03%

+1.42%

Dividends

RLTY vs. SCHH - Dividend Comparison

RLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.30%, more than SCHH's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RLTY
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund
8.30%8.98%8.93%9.18%6.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
2.72%3.04%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.86%3.64%2.22%2.81%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


RLTY and SCHH have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHH has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to RLTY (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLTY dropped -35.44% vs SCHH's -44.22%.

SCHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLTY and SCHH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer