STK vs. CEF
STK (Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund) and CEF (Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust) are both mutual funds - STK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Columbia, while CEF is a Gold fund actively managed by Sprott. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, STK returned 22.24%/yr vs 10.54%/yr for CEF. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. STK charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for CEF.
Performance
STK vs. CEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STK achieves a 36.26% return, which is significantly higher than CEF's -12.64% return. Over the past 10 years, STK has outperformed CEF with an annualized return of 22.24%, while CEF has yielded a comparatively lower 10.54% annualized return.
STK
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- 6M
- 25.48%
- YTD
- 36.26%
- 1Y
- 72.54%
- 3Y*
- 28.58%
- 5Y*
- 18.94%
- 10Y*
- 22.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.69%
CEF
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- 6M
- -19.38%
- YTD
- -12.64%
- 1Y
- 30.45%
- 3Y*
- 29.51%
- 5Y*
- 16.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $23.56M | $24.31M | $29.31M | |
| $3.19M | $2.84M | $3.58M |
STK vs. CEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund | 36.26% | 24.85% | 17.74% | 46.60% | -30.36% | 48.63% | 25.39% | 52.73% | -14.91% | 33.52% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | -12.64% | 92.76% | 24.07% | 6.80% | 1.07% | -8.32% | 31.99% | 16.91% | -6.34% | 18.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between STK and CEF is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2009 | 0.10 |
The correlation between STK and CEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STK vs. CEF — Risk / Return Rank
STK
CEF
STK vs. CEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund (STK) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STK | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.18 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 0.97 | +2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.27 | 2.07 | +10.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STK vs. CEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STK drawdown since its inception was -41.74%, smaller than the maximum CEF drawdown of -62.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STK and CEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STK | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.74% | -62.29% | +20.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.93% | -34.12% | +13.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.59% | -34.12% | +7.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.27% | -34.12% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.74% | -34.12% | -7.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.89% | -32.43% | +17.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.44% | -27.35% | +19.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.69% | 15.94% | -10.25% |
Volatility
STK vs. CEF - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund (STK) has a higher volatility of 11.01% compared to Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) at 8.59%. This indicates that STK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STK | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.01% | 8.59% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.42% | 35.16% | -9.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.07% | 40.14% | -11.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.22% | 24.95% | +1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.66% | 22.06% | +4.60% |
STK vs. CEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
STK has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CEF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
STK vs. CEF - Dividend Comparison
STK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, while CEF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund | 5.53% | 7.38% | 16.02% | 6.70% | 12.62% | 8.48% | 6.79% | 7.86% | 14.88% | 11.82% | 9.87% | 10.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STK and CEF have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STK has higher volatility (11.01%) compared to CEF (8.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STK dropped -41.74% vs CEF's -62.29%.
STK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STK and CEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer