STK vs. GGN
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) and GAMCO Global Gold, Natural Resources and Income Trust (GGN).
STK is an actively managed fund by Aberdeen. It was launched on Nov 25, 2009. GGN is managed by Gabelli. It was launched on Jan 4, 2005.
Performance
STK vs. GGN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
STK vs. GGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund | 4.31% | 24.85% | 17.74% | 46.60% | -30.36% | 48.63% | 25.39% | 52.73% | -14.91% | 33.52% |
GGN GAMCO Global Gold, Natural Resources and Income Trust | 4.82% | 48.19% | 9.59% | 15.01% | 6.80% | 17.41% | -8.62% | 36.59% | -19.53% | 9.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STK achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly lower than GGN's 4.82% return. Over the past 10 years, STK has outperformed GGN with an annualized return of 19.03%, while GGN has yielded a comparatively lower 11.12% annualized return.
STK
- 1D
- 5.54%
- 1M
- -6.23%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- 1Y
- 46.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.46%
- 10Y*
- 19.03%
GGN
- 1D
- 4.11%
- 1M
- -7.28%
- YTD
- 4.82%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- 1Y
- 31.12%
- 3Y*
- 23.74%
- 5Y*
- 19.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STK vs. GGN - Expense Ratio Comparison
STK has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than GGN's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
STK vs. GGN — Risk / Return Rank
STK
GGN
STK vs. GGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) and GAMCO Global Gold, Natural Resources and Income Trust (GGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STK | GGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 1.27 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 1.65 | +0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.24 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 1.91 | +1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 7.45 | +4.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STK | GGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.27 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.98 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.47 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.15 | +0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between STK and GGN is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
STK vs. GGN - Dividend Comparison
STK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, more than GGN's 6.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund | 7.16% | 7.38% | 16.02% | 6.70% | 12.62% | 8.48% | 6.79% | 7.86% | 14.88% | 11.82% | 9.87% | 10.32% |
GGN GAMCO Global Gold, Natural Resources and Income Trust | 6.77% | 6.98% | 9.55% | 10.37% | 9.92% | 9.60% | 13.68% | 13.64% | 16.22% | 11.52% | 15.85% | 17.68% |
Drawdowns
STK vs. GGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STK drawdown since its inception was -41.74%, smaller than the maximum GGN drawdown of -73.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STK and GGN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| STK | GGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.74% | -73.04% | +31.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -16.80% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.27% | -22.08% | -14.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.74% | -53.04% | +11.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.51% | -8.55% | +1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -31.99% | +24.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 4.30% | -0.63% |
Volatility
STK vs. GGN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Closed Fund (STK) is 9.65%, while GAMCO Global Gold, Natural Resources and Income Trust (GGN) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that STK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| STK | GGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.65% | 10.69% | -1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.90% | 20.48% | -2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.65% | 24.59% | +1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.83% | 19.46% | +5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 23.53% | +2.38% |