STI vs. MET

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

STI (Solidion Technology Inc) and MET (MetLife, Inc.) are both stocks. STI operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while MET operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services). Over the past year, STI returned 220.36% vs 10.19% for MET. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

STI vs. MET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Solidion Technology Inc (STI) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STI achieves a 75.32% return, which is significantly higher than MET's 8.80% return.

STI

• 1D: 5.07%
• 1M: 151.11%
• YTD: 75.32%
• 6M: 82.53%
• 1Y: 220.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MET

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 8.80%
• 6M: 5.97%
• 1Y: 10.19%
• 3Y*: 19.69%
• 5Y*: 10.06%
• 10Y*: 15.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STI vs. MET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
STI Solidion Technology Inc	75.32%	-79.65%	-86.85%
MET MetLife, Inc.	8.80%	-0.80%	29.20%

Correlation

The correlation between STI and MET is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024	0.07

Fundamentals

EPS STI : -$12.04 MET : $7.21
PS Ratio STI : 3.17K MET : 0.55
Total Revenue (TTM) STI : $13.35K MET : $76.95B
Gross Profit (TTM) STI : $6.70K MET : $14.75B
EBITDA (TTM) STI : -$5.86M MET : $4.11B

Return for Risk

STI vs. MET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STI

STI Risk / Return Rank: 81
STI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
STI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
STI Omega Ratio Rank: 98
STI Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
STI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

MET

MET Risk / Return Rank: 55
MET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MET Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
MET Omega Ratio Rank: 50
MET Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
MET Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STI vs. MET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solidion Technology Inc (STI) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STI	MET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	0.43	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.03	0.73	+5.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	1.09	+0.61
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	0.59	+1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.56	1.59	+1.98

STI vs. MET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STI Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is comparable to the MET Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STI and MET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STI vs. MET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STI drawdown since its inception was -98.86%, which is greater than MET's maximum drawdown of -82.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STI and MET.

Drawdown Indicators

	STI	MET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.86%	-82.37%	-16.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-88.57%	-17.46%	-71.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.97%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.09%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-55.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.31%	-4.74%	-90.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-90.51%	-17.60%	-72.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	62.11%	6.44%	+55.67%

Volatility

STI vs. MET - Volatility Comparison

Solidion Technology Inc (STI) has a higher volatility of 171.90% compared to MetLife, Inc. (MET) at 7.60%. This indicates that STI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STI	MET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	171.90%	7.60%	+164.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	191.62%	17.92%	+173.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	495.31%	23.55%	+471.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	364.59%	25.64%	+338.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	364.59%	30.53%	+334.06%

Dividends

STI vs. MET - Dividend Comparison

STI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MET MetLife, Inc.	2.71%	2.85%	2.63%	3.12%	2.74%	3.04%	3.88%	3.41%	4.04%	14.52%	2.92%	3.06%
STI Solidion Technology Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STI and MET in my portfolio?

STI and MET have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STI or MET?

STI has higher volatility (171.90%) compared to MET (7.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STI dropped -98.86% vs MET's -82.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.