STI vs. MET

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Solidion Technology Inc (STI) and MetLife, Inc. (MET).

Performance

STI vs. MET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Solidion Technology Inc (STI) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

STI vs. MET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
STI Solidion Technology Inc	-11.00%	-79.65%	-84.62%
MET MetLife, Inc.	-9.77%	-0.80%	28.02%

Fundamentals

EPS STI : -$2.01 MET : $7.54
PS Ratio STI : 48.52 MET : 0.42
Total Revenue (TTM) STI : $407.96K MET : $76.13B
Gross Profit (TTM) STI : $134.06K MET : $12.20B
EBITDA (TTM) STI : -$3.22M MET : $4.34B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STI achieves a -11.00% return, which is significantly lower than MET's -9.77% return.

STI

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 45.06%
• YTD: -11.00%
• 6M: 35.99%
• 1Y: 4.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MET

• 1D: 3.59%
• 1M: -1.87%
• YTD: -9.77%
• 6M: -12.90%
• 1Y: -9.30%
• 3Y*: 10.23%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: 10.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

STI vs. MET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STI

STI Risk / Return Rank: 60
STI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
STI Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
STI Omega Ratio Rank: 87
STI Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
STI Martin Ratio Rank: 41

MET

MET Risk / Return Rank: 25
MET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
MET Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
MET Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MET Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
MET Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STI vs. MET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solidion Technology Inc (STI) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STI	MET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.01	-0.33	+0.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	-0.26	+3.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	0.96	+0.39
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	-0.46	+0.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.07	-1.15	+1.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STI vs. MET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STI Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is higher than the MET Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STI and MET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STI	MET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01	-0.33	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.28	0.24	-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between STI and MET is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

STI vs. MET - Dividend Comparison

STI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
STI Solidion Technology Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MET MetLife, Inc.	3.21%	2.85%	2.63%	3.12%	2.74%	3.04%	3.88%	3.41%	4.04%	14.52%	2.92%	3.06%

Drawdowns

STI vs. MET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STI drawdown since its inception was -98.67%, which is greater than MET's maximum drawdown of -82.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STI and MET.

Drawdown Indicators

	STI	MET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.67%	-82.37%	-16.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-88.57%	-17.46%	-71.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.09%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-55.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.21%	-16.95%	-80.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.31%	-17.71%	-70.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	58.54%	7.03%	+51.51%

Volatility

STI vs. MET - Volatility Comparison

Solidion Technology Inc (STI) has a higher volatility of 20.34% compared to MetLife, Inc. (MET) at 6.49%. This indicates that STI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STI	MET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.34%	6.49%	+13.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	173.07%	17.81%	+155.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	351.48%	28.54%	+322.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	292.56%	25.68%	+266.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	292.56%	30.74%	+261.82%

Financials