STHH vs. GXPT
STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - STHH tracks the STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return while GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STHH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.
Performance
STHH vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STHH achieves a 187.72% return, which is significantly higher than GXPT's 16.86% return.
STHH
- 1D
- -8.12%
- 1M
- 10.72%
- YTD
- 187.72%
- 6M
- 187.07%
- 1Y
- 158.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPT
- 1D
- -3.44%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STHH vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 187.72% | -20.87% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 16.86% | 11.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between STHH and GXPT is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STHH vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank
STHH
GXPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
STHH vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STHH | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.70 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.65 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STHH vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STHH drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STHH and GXPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STHH | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -18.74% | -15.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.12% | -8.72% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.17% | -5.04% | -5.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.93% | — | — |
Volatility
STHH vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STHH | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.67% | 22.91% | +29.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.51% | 22.91% | +28.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.51% | 22.91% | +28.60% |
STHH vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
STHH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STHH vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison
STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than GXPT's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.12% | 0.14% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 0.70% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STHH and GXPT have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for STHH.
STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.12% for GXPT.
STHH tracks STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for STHH and 0.15% for GXPT.
Find the right allocation for STHH and GXPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer