SSUS vs. QQQA
SSUS (Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF) and QQQA (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Donald L. Hagan LLC, while QQQA is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. SSUS is actively managed, while QQQA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SSUS returned 11.07%/yr vs 14.28%/yr for QQQA. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSUS charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QQQA.
Performance
SSUS vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSUS achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly lower than QQQA's 64.24% return.
SSUS
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- 11.37%
- 6M
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 24.93%
- 3Y*
- 16.83%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQA
- 1D
- -6.13%
- 1M
- 11.00%
- YTD
- 64.24%
- 6M
- 61.01%
- 1Y
- 85.96%
- 3Y*
- 33.54%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- —
SSUS vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSUS Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF | 11.37% | 16.47% | 18.86% | 18.19% | -17.64% | 16.62% |
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 64.24% | 9.87% | 16.17% | 24.98% | -29.08% | 9.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSUS and QQQA is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SSUS and QQQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSUS vs. QQQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSUS
QQQA
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SSUS
QQQA
Communication Services
SSUS
QQQA
Consumer Cyclical
SSUS
QQQA
Financial Services
SSUS
QQQA
-
Healthcare
SSUS
QQQA
Industrials
SSUS
QQQA
-
Real Estate
SSUS
QQQA
-
Utilities
SSUS
QQQA
-
Energy
SSUS
QQQA
Consumer Defensive
SSUS
QQQA
-
Basic Materials
SSUS
QQQA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSUS vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank
SSUS
QQQA
SSUS vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSUS | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.47 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 5.94 | -3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.09 | 21.29 | -9.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSUS vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSUS drawdown since its inception was -23.75%, smaller than the maximum QQQA drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSUS and QQQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSUS | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.75% | -38.44% | +14.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -14.54% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.60% | -30.84% | +13.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.45% | -38.44% | +14.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.59% | -6.13% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -15.54% | +10.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 4.05% | -1.98% |
Volatility
SSUS vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) is 5.85%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a volatility of 17.13%. This indicates that SSUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSUS | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.85% | 17.13% | -11.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.79% | 26.70% | -15.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.18% | 30.23% | -17.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 26.72% | -11.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 26.55% | -9.62% |
SSUS vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSUS has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSUS vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison
SSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than QQQA's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.06% | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.10% | 0.00% |
SSUS Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 0.63% | 0.55% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSUS and QQQA have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQA has higher volatility (17.13%) compared to SSUS (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSUS dropped -23.75% vs QQQA's -38.44%.
On 5-year performance, QQQA leads with 14.28% vs 11.07% for SSUS. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SSUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 14.28% return vs 11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for SSUS.
SSUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.
SSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQA is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Donald L. Hagan LLC and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for SSUS and 0.58% for QQQA.
QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSUS and QQQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer