QQQA vs. MOAT
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT).
QQQA and MOAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQQA is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on May 18, 2021. MOAT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2012. Both QQQA and MOAT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QQQA vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QQQA vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 4.84% | 9.87% | 16.17% | 24.98% | -29.08% | 8.43% |
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -6.87% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 5.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQA achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -6.87% return.
QQQA
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 11.22%
- 1Y
- 26.57%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MOAT
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -9.39%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -2.70%
- 1Y
- 11.53%
- 3Y*
- 10.62%
- 5Y*
- 7.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQQA vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QQQA vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank
QQQA
MOAT
QQQA vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQA | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 0.59 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 0.98 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.13 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 0.83 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.70 | 3.12 | +3.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQA | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 0.59 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.75 | -0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQA and MOAT is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QQQA vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
QQQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than MOAT's 1.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.46% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
Drawdowns
QQQA vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQA drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQA and MOAT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQA | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.44% | -33.31% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -13.30% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.27% | -10.42% | +3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.19% | -3.80% | -12.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 3.55% | +0.67% |
Volatility
QQQA vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a higher volatility of 11.35% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.78%. This indicates that QQQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QQQA | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.35% | 4.78% | +6.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.96% | 10.10% | +10.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.93% | 19.76% | +9.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 18.09% | +7.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 18.71% | +6.69% |