SSUS vs. QCLR
SSUS (Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF) and QCLR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Donald L. Hagan LLC, while QCLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. SSUS is actively managed, while QCLR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SSUS returned 18.55%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for QCLR. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSUS charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLR.
Performance
SSUS vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSUS achieves a 14.61% return, which is significantly higher than QCLR's 1.40% return.
SSUS
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 14.61%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- 1Y
- 29.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- —
QCLR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 11.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSUS vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSUS Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF | 14.61% | 16.47% | 18.86% | 18.19% | -17.64% | 7.88% |
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 1.40% | 11.27% | 20.27% | 28.87% | -18.87% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSUS and QCLR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SSUS and QCLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSUS vs. QCLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSUS
QCLR
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Technology
SSUS
QCLR
Communication Services
SSUS
QCLR
Consumer Cyclical
SSUS
QCLR
Industrials
SSUS
QCLR
Financial Services
SSUS
QCLR
Healthcare
SSUS
QCLR
Real Estate
SSUS
QCLR
Utilities
SSUS
QCLR
Energy
SSUS
QCLR
Consumer Defensive
SSUS
QCLR
Basic Materials
SSUS
QCLR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSUS vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank
SSUS
QCLR
SSUS vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSUS | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.46 | 1.17 | +1.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.35 | 1.60 | +1.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.22 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 1.12 | +2.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.41 | 4.02 | +11.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSUS | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 1.17 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.67 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
SSUS vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSUS drawdown since its inception was -23.75%, which is greater than QCLR's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSUS and QCLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSUS | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.75% | -21.77% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -10.22% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.60% | -13.58% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -0.89% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -6.20% | +0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 2.84% | -0.90% |
Volatility
SSUS vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) has a higher volatility of 3.45% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) at 0.45%. This indicates that SSUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSUS | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | 0.45% | +3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 7.24% | +2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.23% | 9.82% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.26% | 12.42% | +2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 12.42% | +4.44% |
SSUS vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSUS has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSUS vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison
SSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than QCLR's 14.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 14.68% | 14.89% | 8.89% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 1.64% | 0.00% |
SSUS Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 0.63% | 0.55% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSUS and QCLR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSUS has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to QCLR (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSUS dropped -23.75% vs QCLR's -21.77%.
On 3-year performance, SSUS leads with 18.55% vs 13.84% for QCLR. On fees, QCLR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QCLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SSUS has performed better with a 18.55% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QCLR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for SSUS.
QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 14.68%, compared with 0.45% for SSUS.
SSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QCLR is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Donald L. Hagan LLC and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for SSUS and 0.60% for QCLR.
SSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSUS and QCLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer