PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QCLR vs. XCLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QCLR vs. XCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QCLR vs. XCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
-5.98%11.27%20.27%28.87%-18.87%3.02%
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
-4.88%10.25%20.67%15.64%-12.93%3.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCLR achieves a -5.98% return, which is significantly lower than XCLR's -4.88% return.


QCLR

1D
0.74%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
-5.98%
6M
-5.17%
1Y
11.38%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
10Y*

XCLR

1D
0.49%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
-4.88%
6M
-3.76%
1Y
10.37%
3Y*
12.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QCLR vs. XCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QCLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XCLR's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QCLR vs. XCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCLR
QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

XCLR
XCLR Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
XCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QCLR vs. XCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QCLRXCLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.95

0.99

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

1.43

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.19

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

1.28

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.57

5.24

-0.67

QCLR vs. XCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QCLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the XCLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCLR and XCLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QCLRXCLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

0.99

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.59

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between QCLR and XCLR is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QCLR vs. XCLR - Dividend Comparison

QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.83%, more than XCLR's 13.83% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
15.83%14.89%8.89%0.47%0.27%1.64%
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
13.83%13.15%18.76%1.40%1.01%1.70%

Drawdowns

QCLR vs. XCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCLR drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, which is greater than XCLR's maximum drawdown of -14.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLR and XCLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QCLRXCLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.77%

-14.63%

-7.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.22%

-8.29%

-1.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.10%

-6.45%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.32%

-4.82%

-1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.02%

+0.54%

Volatility

QCLR vs. XCLR - Volatility Comparison

Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) at 3.42%. This indicates that QCLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QCLRXCLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

3.42%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.56%

7.16%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

10.53%

+1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

10.58%

+2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

10.58%

+2.03%