SSUS vs. GQGU
SSUS (Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. SSUS charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.
Performance
SSUS vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSUS achieves a 14.61% return, which is significantly higher than GQGU's 6.60% return.
SSUS
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 14.61%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- 1Y
- 29.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSUS vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SSUS Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF | 14.61% | 8.06% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 6.60% | -1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSUS and GQGU is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSUS vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank
SSUS
GQGU
SSUS vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSUS | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.46 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.35 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSUS | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.60 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
SSUS vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSUS drawdown since its inception was -23.75%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSUS and GQGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSUS | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.75% | -6.65% | -17.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -4.66% | +3.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -2.54% | -2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | — | — |
Volatility
SSUS vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSUS | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.23% | 10.14% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.26% | 10.14% | +5.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 10.14% | +6.72% |
SSUS vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSUS has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSUS vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison
SSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than GQGU's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSUS Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 0.63% | 0.55% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSUS and GQGU have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for SSUS.
GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.45% for SSUS.
They also come from different issuers: Donald L. Hagan LLC and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for SSUS and 0.49% for GQGU.
Find the right allocation for SSUS and GQGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer