PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSUS vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSUS vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSUS achieves a 14.61% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 31.75% return.


SSUS

1D
-0.79%
1M
7.35%
YTD
14.61%
6M
14.65%
1Y
29.88%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*

FMTM

1D
0.50%
1M
6.28%
YTD
31.75%
6M
34.74%
1Y
63.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSUS vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SSUS and FMTM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025

0.72

The correlation between SSUS and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSUS vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSUS
SSUS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SSUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SSUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSUS vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSUSFMTMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

2.80

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.35

3.43

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.46

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

5.28

-1.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.41

20.62

-5.21

SSUS vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSUS and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSUSFMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.80

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

2.38

-1.54

Drawdowns

SSUS vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSUS drawdown since its inception was -23.75%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSUS and FMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSUSFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.75%

-12.12%

-11.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-12.12%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

0.00%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-1.89%

-3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

3.10%

-1.16%

Volatility

SSUS vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) is 3.45%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that SSUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSUSFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

6.52%

-3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

17.83%

-8.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.23%

22.82%

-10.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.26%

22.94%

-7.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.86%

22.94%

-6.08%

SSUS vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSUS has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSUS vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

SSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than FMTM's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
0.22%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSUS
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF
0.45%0.52%0.68%1.07%0.63%0.55%0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSUS and FMTM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMTM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to SSUS (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSUS dropped -23.75% vs FMTM's -12.12%.

On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 63.62% vs 29.88% for SSUS. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SSUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 63.62% return vs 29.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for SSUS.

SSUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.22% for FMTM.

SSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for SSUS and 0.45% for FMTM.

FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSUS and FMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer