FMTM vs. SGRT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMTM is a Momentum fund, while SGRT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FMTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

FMTM vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMTM achieves a 30.53% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 45.10% return.

FMTM

• 1D: -3.43%
• 1M: 4.31%
• YTD: 30.53%
• 6M: 28.10%
• 1Y: 61.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SGRT

• 1D: -5.57%
• 1M: 3.81%
• YTD: 45.10%
• 6M: 41.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMTM vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	30.53%	19.66%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	45.10%	26.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FMTM and SGRT is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.85

Return for Risk

FMTM vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMTM

FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 81
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

SGRT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMTM vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMTM	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.06	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.29	—	—

Drawdowns

FMTM vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMTM drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum SGRT drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTM and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMTM	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.12%	-17.87%	+5.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.43%	-5.57%	+2.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.91%	-3.22%	+1.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FMTM	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.38%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.05%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.27%	35.41%	-11.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.68%	35.41%	-11.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.68%	35.41%	-11.73%

FMTM vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMTM vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

FMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	0.23%	0.30%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.11%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMTM and SGRT in my portfolio?

FMTM and SGRT have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FMTM or SGRT?

On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMTM or SGRT?

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMTM or SGRT?

FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.

What is the main difference between FMTM and SGRT?

FMTM is categorized as Momentum, while SGRT is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FMTM and 0.59% for SGRT.