CRDBX vs. QUS
Compare and contrast key facts about Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS).
CRDBX is managed by Potomac Fund Management Inc.. It was launched on Jun 30, 2020. QUS is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). It was launched on Apr 16, 2015.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CRDBX or QUS.
Correlation
The correlation between CRDBX and QUS is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CRDBX vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CRDBX:
0.16
QUS:
0.71
CRDBX:
0.43
QUS:
1.09
CRDBX:
1.07
QUS:
1.16
CRDBX:
0.15
QUS:
0.77
CRDBX:
0.46
QUS:
3.27
CRDBX:
9.57%
QUS:
3.30%
CRDBX:
26.80%
QUS:
15.23%
CRDBX:
-42.59%
QUS:
-33.78%
CRDBX:
-17.25%
QUS:
-5.79%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRDBX achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's -0.43% return.
CRDBX
4.44%
11.89%
12.99%
4.53%
N/A
N/A
QUS
-0.43%
-1.52%
-0.05%
12.48%
15.16%
13.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CRDBX vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRDBX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CRDBX vs. QUS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CRDBX
QUS
CRDBX vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CRDBX vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
CRDBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than QUS's 1.50% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDBX Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
Drawdowns
CRDBX vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRDBX drawdown since its inception was -42.59%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDBX and QUS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CRDBX vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) has a higher volatility of 15.98% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 11.32%. This indicates that CRDBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.