PortfoliosLab logo
CRDBX vs. CRTBX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CRDBX and CRTBX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Performance

CRDBX vs. CRTBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) and Conquer Risk Tactical Rotation Fund (CRTBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
40.09%
7.88%
CRDBX
CRTBX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CRDBX:

0.16

CRTBX:

0.13

Sortino Ratio

CRDBX:

0.43

CRTBX:

0.28

Omega Ratio

CRDBX:

1.07

CRTBX:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

CRDBX:

0.15

CRTBX:

0.09

Martin Ratio

CRDBX:

0.46

CRTBX:

0.48

Ulcer Index

CRDBX:

9.57%

CRTBX:

3.76%

Daily Std Dev

CRDBX:

26.80%

CRTBX:

13.29%

Max Drawdown

CRDBX:

-42.59%

CRTBX:

-26.62%

Current Drawdown

CRDBX:

-17.25%

CRTBX:

-15.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDBX achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly higher than CRTBX's -1.77% return.


CRDBX

YTD

4.44%

1M

11.89%

6M

12.99%

1Y

4.53%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CRTBX

YTD

-1.77%

1M

1.64%

6M

3.11%

1Y

1.98%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CRDBX vs. CRTBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRDBX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CRTBX's 1.58% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for CRTBX: current value is 1.58%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CRTBX: 1.58%
Expense ratio chart for CRDBX: current value is 1.24%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CRDBX: 1.24%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRDBX vs. CRTBX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRDBX is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRDBX is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRDBX is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRDBX is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRDBX is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRDBX is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

CRTBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRTBX is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRTBX is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRTBX is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRTBX is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRTBX is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRTBX is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CRDBX vs. CRTBX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) and Conquer Risk Tactical Rotation Fund (CRTBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CRDBX, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00
CRDBX: 0.16
CRTBX: 0.13
The chart of Sortino ratio for CRDBX, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
CRDBX: 0.43
CRTBX: 0.28
The chart of Omega ratio for CRDBX, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
CRDBX: 1.07
CRTBX: 1.04
The chart of Calmar ratio for CRDBX, currently valued at 0.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
CRDBX: 0.15
CRTBX: 0.09
The chart of Martin ratio for CRDBX, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.00
CRDBX: 0.46
CRTBX: 0.48

The current CRDBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is comparable to the CRTBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDBX and CRTBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.16
0.13
CRDBX
CRTBX

Dividends

CRDBX vs. CRTBX - Dividend Comparison

CRDBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than CRTBX's 1.34% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020
CRDBX
Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund
1.03%1.07%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CRTBX
Conquer Risk Tactical Rotation Fund
1.34%1.32%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.19%

Drawdowns

CRDBX vs. CRTBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDBX drawdown since its inception was -42.59%, which is greater than CRTBX's maximum drawdown of -26.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDBX and CRTBX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-17.25%
-15.68%
CRDBX
CRTBX

Volatility

CRDBX vs. CRTBX - Volatility Comparison

Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) has a higher volatility of 15.98% compared to Conquer Risk Tactical Rotation Fund (CRTBX) at 5.39%. This indicates that CRDBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
15.98%
5.39%
CRDBX
CRTBX