PortfoliosLab logo
CRDBX vs. CRTBX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CRDBX and CRTBX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CRDBX vs. CRTBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) and Conquer Risk Tactical Rotation Fund (CRTBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CRDBX:

0.48

CRTBX:

0.39

Sortino Ratio

CRDBX:

0.86

CRTBX:

0.68

Omega Ratio

CRDBX:

1.13

CRTBX:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

CRDBX:

0.65

CRTBX:

0.53

Martin Ratio

CRDBX:

1.70

CRTBX:

1.47

Ulcer Index

CRDBX:

6.23%

CRTBX:

3.64%

Daily Std Dev

CRDBX:

24.74%

CRTBX:

12.97%

Max Drawdown

CRDBX:

-28.34%

CRTBX:

-12.54%

Current Drawdown

CRDBX:

-3.88%

CRTBX:

-4.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDBX achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly higher than CRTBX's -1.49% return.


CRDBX

YTD

2.45%

1M

-1.90%

6M

0.99%

1Y

11.71%

3Y*

18.49%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CRTBX

YTD

-1.49%

1M

-0.19%

6M

-3.31%

1Y

5.07%

3Y*

4.45%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund

CRDBX vs. CRTBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRDBX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CRTBX's 1.58% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRDBX vs. CRTBX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRDBX is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRDBX is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRDBX is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRDBX is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRDBX is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRDBX is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

CRTBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRTBX is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRTBX is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRTBX is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRTBX is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRTBX is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRTBX is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CRDBX vs. CRTBX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) and Conquer Risk Tactical Rotation Fund (CRTBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CRDBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is comparable to the CRTBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDBX and CRTBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CRDBX vs. CRTBX - Dividend Comparison

CRDBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.28%, more than CRTBX's 5.11% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020
CRDBX
Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund
12.28%12.58%9.91%0.18%25.06%1.65%
CRTBX
Conquer Risk Tactical Rotation Fund
5.11%5.03%1.03%0.14%19.33%2.85%

Drawdowns

CRDBX vs. CRTBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDBX drawdown since its inception was -28.34%, which is greater than CRTBX's maximum drawdown of -12.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDBX and CRTBX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CRDBX vs. CRTBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) is 1.35%, while Conquer Risk Tactical Rotation Fund (CRTBX) has a volatility of 1.80%. This indicates that CRDBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRTBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...