PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSUS vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSUS vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSUS achieves a 14.61% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.


SSUS

1D
-0.79%
1M
7.35%
YTD
14.61%
6M
14.65%
1Y
29.88%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*

COMT

1D
0.78%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
39.67%
6M
39.06%
1Y
47.51%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSUS vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SSUS
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF
14.61%16.47%18.86%18.19%-17.64%28.02%17.44%
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
39.67%6.07%5.96%-6.56%19.45%36.88%-18.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SSUS and COMT is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

0.18

The correlation between SSUS and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SSUS vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SSUS
COMT

Technology

45.5%

-

Communication Services

17.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%

-

Industrials

6.5%

-

Financial Services

5.5%
100.0%

Healthcare

4.4%

-

Real Estate

3.8%

-

Utilities

3.7%

-

Energy

2.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Technology

SSUS
45.5%
COMT

-

Communication Services

SSUS
17.2%
COMT

-

Consumer Cyclical

SSUS
6.6%
COMT

-

Industrials

SSUS
6.5%
COMT

-

Financial Services

SSUS
5.5%
COMT
100.0%

Healthcare

SSUS
4.4%
COMT

-

Real Estate

SSUS
3.8%
COMT

-

Utilities

SSUS
3.7%
COMT

-

Energy

SSUS
2.8%
COMT

-

Consumer Defensive

SSUS
2.4%
COMT

-

Basic Materials

SSUS
1.6%
COMT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSUS vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSUS
SSUS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SSUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SSUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSUS vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSUSCOMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.40

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

5.95

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.41

14.11

+1.30

SSUS vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSUS and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSUSCOMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.24

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.64

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.20

+0.64

Drawdowns

SSUS vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSUS drawdown since its inception was -23.75%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSUS and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSUSCOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.75%

-51.89%

+28.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-8.02%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.60%

-13.31%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.45%

-29.00%

+5.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-4.82%

+4.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-24.07%

+18.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

3.38%

-1.44%

Volatility

SSUS vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) is 3.45%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that SSUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSUSCOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

7.37%

-3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

18.80%

-9.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.23%

21.29%

-9.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.26%

21.06%

-5.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.86%

18.89%

-2.03%

SSUS vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSUS has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSUS vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

SSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than COMT's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF
5.54%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
SSUS
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector ETF
0.45%0.52%0.68%1.07%0.63%0.55%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSUS and COMT have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to SSUS (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSUS dropped -23.75% vs COMT's -51.89%.

On 5-year performance, COMT leads with 13.50% vs 11.91% for SSUS. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, SSUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COMT has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 11.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for SSUS.

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.45% for SSUS.

SSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Donald L. Hagan LLC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for SSUS and 0.48% for COMT.

SSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSUS and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer