COMT vs. BCI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI).
COMT and BCI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COMT is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Oct 15, 2014. BCI is an actively managed fund by Abrdn Plc. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: COMT or BCI.
Performance
COMT vs. BCI - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COMT achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 1.86% return.
COMT
1.60%
-1.81%
-7.42%
-1.65%
6.01%
0.31%
BCI
1.86%
-2.04%
-7.02%
-0.89%
6.51%
N/A
Key characteristics
| COMT | BCI | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.17 | -0.18 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.14 | -0.16 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.98 | 0.98 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.10 | -0.09 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.57 | -0.41 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.61% | 5.35% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.00% | 12.64% |
| Max Drawdown | -51.89% | -32.69% |
| Current Drawdown | -24.06% | -22.35% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COMT vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
COMT has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between COMT and BCI is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
COMT vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
COMT vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison
COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than BCI's 3.86% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.11% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% | 0.56% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 3.86% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
COMT vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COMT drawdown since its inception was -51.89%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMT and BCI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
COMT vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison
iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) at 3.56%. This indicates that COMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.