PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSRM vs. EZPW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SSRM vs. EZPW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSRM achieves a 30.38% return, which is significantly lower than EZPW's 75.44% return. Over the past 10 years, SSRM has underperformed EZPW with an annualized return of 7.68%, while EZPW has yielded a comparatively higher 13.43% annualized return.


SSRM

1D
-1.96%
1M
8.59%
6M
29.85%
YTD
30.38%
1Y
125.75%
3Y*
27.10%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
7.68%

EZPW

1D
0.00%
1M
10.80%
6M
59.43%
YTD
75.44%
1Y
140.10%
3Y*
58.17%
5Y*
41.25%
10Y*
13.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSRM vs. EZPW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
30.38%214.94%-35.32%-29.94%-10.02%-10.90%4.41%59.31%37.54%-1.46%
EZPW
EZCORP, Inc.
75.44%58.92%39.82%7.24%10.58%53.86%-29.77%-11.77%-36.64%14.55%

Correlation

The correlation between SSRM and EZPW is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 1996

0.10

The correlation between SSRM and EZPW shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (10 years) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SSRM:

$5.93B

EZPW:

$2.00B

EPS

SSRM:

$3.26

EZPW:

$1.76

PE Ratio

SSRM:

8.76

EZPW:

19.36

PEG Ratio

SSRM:

0.14

EZPW:

0.13

PS Ratio

SSRM:

3.27

EZPW:

1.92

PB Ratio

SSRM:

1.40

EZPW:

2.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

SSRM:

$1.90B

EZPW:

$1.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SSRM:

$643.76M

EZPW:

$865.21M

EBITDA (TTM)

SSRM:

$835.27M

EZPW:

$256.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSRM vs. EZPW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSRM
SSRM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SSRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSRM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SSRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSRM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

EZPW
EZPW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
EZPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZPW Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
EZPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZPW Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSRM vs. EZPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSRMEZPWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.58

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

9.11

-4.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.21

32.14

-21.93

SSRM vs. EZPW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSRM Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the EZPW Sharpe Ratio of 3.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSRM and EZPW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSRM vs. EZPW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSRM drawdown since its inception was -91.68%, smaller than the maximum EZPW drawdown of -97.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSRM and EZPW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSRMEZPWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.68%

-97.28%

+5.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.28%

-16.19%

-15.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.41%

-20.51%

-52.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.16%

-35.94%

-47.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.16%

-76.59%

-6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.34%

-10.51%

-23.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.09%

-59.00%

+1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.80%

4.58%

+8.22%

Volatility

SSRM vs. EZPW - Volatility Comparison

SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) and EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) have volatilities of 19.50% and 19.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSRMEZPWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.50%

19.30%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.96%

29.72%

+26.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.57%

37.56%

+30.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.32%

34.42%

+21.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.08%

38.98%

+14.10%

Dividends

SSRM vs. EZPW - Dividend Comparison

Neither SSRM nor EZPW has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
EZPW
EZCORP, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.60%1.79%1.13%

Financials

SSRM vs. EZPW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SSR Mining Inc. and EZCORP, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
581.78M
446.88M
(SSRM) Total Revenue
(EZPW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SSRM vs. EZPW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SSR Mining Inc. and EZCORP, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
58.2%
Portfolio components
SSRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 581.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EZPW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a gross profit of 260.04M and revenue of 446.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.

SSRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 300.38M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.6%.

EZPW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported an operating income of 67.84M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.

SSRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a net income of 369.74M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in a net margin of 63.6%.

EZPW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a net income of 49.10M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SSRM and EZPW have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSRM has higher volatility (19.50%) compared to EZPW (19.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSRM dropped -91.68% vs EZPW's -97.28%.

EZPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSRM and EZPW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer