SSMG vs. PAMC

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

SSMG (Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF) and PAMC (Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. SSMG is actively managed, while PAMC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SSMG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PAMC.

Performance

SSMG vs. PAMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF (SSMG) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SSMG

• 1D: 3.18%
• 1M: -0.84%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

PAMC

• 1D: 2.01%
• 1M: 2.12%
• 6M: 13.01%
• YTD: 19.23%
• 1Y: 28.70%
• 3Y*: 17.14%
• 5Y*: 10.21%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	$200.87K	$149.13K	$355.28K
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF	$5.89K	$3.26K	$5.76K

SSMG vs. PAMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF	7.79%
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	7.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SSMG and PAMC is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026	0.86

SSMG vs. PAMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SSMG	PAMC
Industrials	25.8%	23.2%
Technology	25.3%	10.8%
Healthcare	18.6%	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	12.5%
Financial Services	8.2%	19.8%
Energy	4.5%	7.8%
Basic Materials	3.5%	5.5%
Utilities	1.5%	3.5%
Communication Services	1.4%	0.8%
Real Estate	0.7%	6.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.4%

Return for Risk

SSMG vs. PAMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SSMG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PAMC

PAMC Risk / Return Rank: 63
PAMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
PAMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
PAMC Omega Ratio Rank: 56
PAMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PAMC Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SSMG vs. PAMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF (SSMG) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSMG	PAMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.52	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.23	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.81	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.18	—

Drawdowns

SSMG vs. PAMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSMG drawdown since its inception was -13.72%, smaller than the maximum PAMC drawdown of -27.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMG and PAMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSMG	PAMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.72%	-27.04%	+13.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.24%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.07%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.83%	-0.29%	-4.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.36%	-7.32%	+3.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.83%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SSMG	PAMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.73%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.58%	18.93%	+9.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.58%	20.24%	+8.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.58%	20.63%	+7.95%

SSMG vs. PAMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSMG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PAMC's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSMG vs. PAMC - Dividend Comparison

SSMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	1.09%	1.11%	0.97%	0.69%	1.29%	0.36%	0.30%
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSMG and PAMC in my portfolio?

SSMG and PAMC have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SSMG or PAMC?

On fees, SSMG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SSMG or PAMC?

SSMG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PAMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SSMG or PAMC?

PAMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.00% for SSMG.

What is the main difference between SSMG and PAMC?

They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SSMG and 0.60% for PAMC.