PAMC vs. XMHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ).
PAMC and XMHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAMC is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2020. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. Both PAMC and XMHQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PAMC or XMHQ.
Key characteristics
| PAMC | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.56% | 18.41% |
| 1Y Return | 35.23% | 45.93% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.34% | 11.13% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.04 | 2.62 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.61% | 16.94% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.04% | -58.19% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.82% | -4.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAMC and XMHQ is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PAMC vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PAMC having a 18.56% return and XMHQ slightly lower at 18.41%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAMC vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PAMC vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PAMC vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison
PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than XMHQ's 0.61% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 0.54% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 0.61% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.63% | 1.34% | 1.25% | 1.11% |
Drawdowns
PAMC vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, smaller than the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and XMHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PAMC vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) have volatilities of 4.67% and 4.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.