PAMC vs. XMHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ).
PAMC and XMHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAMC is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2020. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. Both PAMC and XMHQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PAMC or XMHQ.
Correlation
The correlation between PAMC and XMHQ is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PAMC vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PAMC:
1.77
XMHQ:
0.94
PAMC:
2.55
XMHQ:
1.42
PAMC:
1.31
XMHQ:
1.17
PAMC:
3.53
XMHQ:
1.68
PAMC:
8.16
XMHQ:
3.46
PAMC:
3.62%
XMHQ:
5.00%
PAMC:
16.73%
XMHQ:
18.45%
PAMC:
-27.03%
XMHQ:
-58.19%
PAMC:
-3.31%
XMHQ:
-6.21%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAMC achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly higher than XMHQ's 3.95% return.
PAMC
5.14%
5.14%
8.84%
30.50%
N/A
N/A
XMHQ
3.95%
3.95%
2.72%
17.94%
16.63%
12.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAMC vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PAMC vs. XMHQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PAMC
XMHQ
PAMC vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PAMC vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison
PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than XMHQ's 5.00% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 0.93% | 0.97% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 5.00% | 5.20% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.64% | 1.34% | 1.25% |
Drawdowns
PAMC vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.03%, smaller than the maximum XMHQ drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and XMHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PAMC vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) is 3.87%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that PAMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.