PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAMC vs. AFMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PAMC vs. AFMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PAMC vs. AFMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
2.88%1.54%26.20%19.30%-12.15%13.15%34.03%
AFMC
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
3.16%10.23%19.06%21.46%-15.55%25.75%29.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAMC achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than AFMC's 3.16% return.


PAMC

1D
4.11%
1M
-4.94%
YTD
2.88%
6M
2.73%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*

AFMC

1D
2.65%
1M
-4.78%
YTD
3.16%
6M
4.11%
1Y
17.62%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PAMC vs. AFMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AFMC's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PAMC vs. AFMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAMC
PAMC Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PAMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PAMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAMC Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

AFMC
AFMC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AFMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AFMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFMC Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAMC vs. AFMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAMCAFMCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

0.91

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.08

1.41

-0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.19

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

1.41

-0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.20

6.07

-1.87

PAMC vs. AFMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is comparable to the AFMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAMC and AFMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAMCAFMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.91

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.47

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.46

+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between PAMC and AFMC is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PAMC vs. AFMC - Dividend Comparison

PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than AFMC's 0.88% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
PAMC
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF
1.26%1.11%0.97%0.69%1.29%0.36%0.30%0.00%
AFMC
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
0.88%0.96%0.64%0.87%1.42%0.84%1.05%0.29%

Drawdowns

PAMC vs. AFMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, smaller than the maximum AFMC drawdown of -42.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and AFMC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PAMCAFMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.04%

-42.14%

+15.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.60%

-13.18%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.04%

-25.40%

-1.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.30%

-5.77%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-7.80%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

3.05%

+0.47%

Volatility

PAMC vs. AFMC - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has a higher volatility of 9.01% compared to First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) at 6.01%. This indicates that PAMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PAMCAFMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.01%

6.01%

+3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.66%

11.36%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.61%

19.43%

+2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.42%

18.97%

+1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.82%

23.11%

-2.29%