PAMC vs. QVMM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PAMC (Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) and QVMM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAMC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while QVMM is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PAMC returned 18.94%/yr vs 17.02%/yr for QVMM. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PAMC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QVMM.

Performance

PAMC vs. QVMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAMC achieves a 19.58% return, which is significantly higher than QVMM's 16.39% return.

PAMC

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 4.55%
• YTD: 19.58%
• 6M: 16.63%
• 1Y: 32.16%
• 3Y*: 18.94%
• 5Y*: 9.70%
• 10Y*: —

QVMM

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 3.88%
• YTD: 16.39%
• 6M: 14.05%
• 1Y: 28.74%
• 3Y*: 17.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAMC vs. QVMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	19.58%	1.54%	26.20%	19.30%	-12.15%	-1.22%
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF	16.39%	8.82%	13.36%	15.43%	-13.06%	6.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PAMC and QVMM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021	0.95

The correlation between PAMC and QVMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

PAMC vs. QVMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PAMC	QVMM
Industrials	25.8%	26.1%
Technology	16.1%	15.6%
Financial Services	15.8%	14.7%
Consumer Cyclical	11.8%	9.8%
Energy	9.8%	4.9%
Basic Materials	5.6%	4.8%
Real Estate	4.0%	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	3.6%
Healthcare	3.4%	9.2%
Utilities	3.1%	3.2%
Communication Services	0.7%	0.8%

Return for Risk

PAMC vs. QVMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAMC

PAMC Risk / Return Rank: 57
PAMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
PAMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PAMC Omega Ratio Rank: 51
PAMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
PAMC Martin Ratio Rank: 66

QVMM

QVMM Risk / Return Rank: 62
QVMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
QVMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QVMM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
QVMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QVMM Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAMC vs. QVMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAMC	QVMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	1.86	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	2.69	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.33	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	3.48	-0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.67	12.50	-0.82

PAMC vs. QVMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the QVMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAMC and QVMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAMC vs. QVMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, which is greater than QVMM's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and QVMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAMC	QVMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.04%	-24.00%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.24%	-8.30%	-1.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.07%	-24.00%	-2.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.42%	-7.02%	-0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	2.31%	+0.45%

Volatility

PAMC vs. QVMM - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) at 4.43%. This indicates that PAMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QVMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAMC	QVMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.27%	4.43%	+0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.35%	11.57%	+2.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.89%	15.58%	+3.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.39%	19.46%	+0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.72%	19.46%	+1.26%

PAMC vs. QVMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QVMM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAMC vs. QVMM - Dividend Comparison

PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than QVMM's 1.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	1.09%	1.11%	0.97%	0.69%	1.29%	0.36%	0.30%
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF	1.43%	1.32%	1.29%	1.42%	1.51%	0.60%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAMC and QVMM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, PAMC and QVMM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PAMC or QVMM?

PAMC has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to QVMM (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAMC dropped -27.04% vs QVMM's -24.00%.

Which ETF is better, PAMC or QVMM?

On 3-year performance, PAMC leads with 18.94% vs 17.02% for QVMM. On fees, QVMM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QVMM has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PAMC or QVMM?

Over the 3-year period, PAMC has performed better with a 18.94% return vs 17.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAMC or QVMM?

QVMM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PAMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PAMC or QVMM?

QVMM has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 1.09% for PAMC.

What is the main difference between PAMC and QVMM?

PAMC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while QVMM is Multi-factor. PAMC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while QVMM tracks S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PAMC and 0.15% for QVMM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QVMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.