PAMC vs. PALC
PAMC (Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) and PALC (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAMC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while PALC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital U.S. Large Cap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAMC returned 8.58%/yr vs 9.40%/yr for PALC. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
PAMC vs. PALC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAMC achieves a 17.95% return, which is significantly higher than PALC's 11.39% return.
PAMC
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 17.95%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- 1Y
- 28.44%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- —
PALC
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 6.95%
- YTD
- 11.39%
- 6M
- 12.77%
- 1Y
- 21.51%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- —
PAMC vs. PALC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 17.95% | 1.54% | 26.20% | 19.30% | -12.15% | 13.15% | 34.03% |
PALC Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 11.39% | 7.28% | 21.24% | 17.52% | -14.74% | 41.03% | 22.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAMC and PALC is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020 | 0.78 |
The correlation between PAMC and PALC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
PAMC vs. PALC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAMC
PALC
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Healthcare
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
PAMC
PALC
Financial Services
PAMC
PALC
Technology
PAMC
PALC
Consumer Cyclical
PAMC
PALC
Energy
PAMC
PALC
Basic Materials
PAMC
PALC
Consumer Defensive
PAMC
PALC
Real Estate
PAMC
PALC
Healthcare
PAMC
PALC
Utilities
PAMC
PALC
Communication Services
PAMC
PALC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAMC vs. PALC — Risk / Return Rank
PAMC
PALC
PAMC vs. PALC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAMC | PALC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.32 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 2.42 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 8.98 | +1.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAMC | PALC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.87 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.58 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.98 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
PAMC vs. PALC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, which is greater than PALC's maximum drawdown of -24.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and PALC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAMC | PALC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.04% | -24.45% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -8.94% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.07% | -17.39% | -8.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.04% | -24.45% | -2.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.38% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -6.33% | -1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 2.40% | +0.36% |
Volatility
PAMC vs. PALC - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) at 2.95%. This indicates that PAMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAMC | PALC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 2.95% | +2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.17% | 8.55% | +5.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.44% | 11.58% | +6.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 16.22% | +4.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 17.07% | +3.66% |
PAMC vs. PALC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PAMC and PALC have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
PAMC vs. PALC - Dividend Comparison
PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than PALC's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALC Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.04% | 1.08% | 0.93% | 0.74% | 1.69% | 0.64% | 0.72% |
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.10% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAMC and PALC have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAMC has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to PALC (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAMC dropped -27.04% vs PALC's -24.45%.
On 5-year performance, PALC leads with 9.40% vs 8.58% for PAMC. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PALC has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PALC has performed better with a 9.40% return vs 8.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAMC and PALC have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
PAMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 1.04% for PALC.
PAMC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while PALC is Large Cap Growth Equities. PAMC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while PALC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. Large Cap Multi-Factor Rotation Index.
PALC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAMC and PALC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer