SSMG vs. QQQN

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

SSMG (Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. SSMG is actively managed, while QQQN is passively managed. SSMG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

SSMG vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF (SSMG) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SSMG

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -5.80%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF	$3.80K	$2.65K	$7.10K

SSMG vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SSMG Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF	2.72%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

SSMG vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SSMG	QQQN
Technology	25.7%	47.3%
Industrials	25.4%	8.7%
Healthcare	18.5%	19.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	13.7%
Financial Services	8.0%	-
Energy	4.5%	-
Basic Materials	3.4%	1.9%
Utilities	1.4%	1.6%
Communication Services	1.4%	5.5%
Real Estate	0.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

SSMG vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Silvant Small/Mid Growth ETF (SSMG) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

SSMG vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSMG drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSMG and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSMG	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.58%	0.00%	-9.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.31%	0.00%	-9.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.80%	0.00%	-2.80%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SSMG	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.04%	0.00%	+27.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.04%	0.00%	+27.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.04%	0.00%	+27.04%

SSMG vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSMG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSMG vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

Neither SSMG nor QQQN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, SSMG or QQQN?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SSMG or QQQN?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SSMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SSMG or QQQN?

SSMG and QQQN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SSMG and QQQN?

They also come from different issuers: Virtus and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SSMG and 0.18% for QQQN.