PAMC vs. SPY
PAMC (Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAMC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAMC returned 9.70%/yr vs 13.51%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PAMC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
PAMC vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAMC achieves a 19.58% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 9.74% return.
PAMC
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 19.58%
- 6M
- 16.63%
- 1Y
- 32.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.94%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
PAMC vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 19.58% | 1.54% | 26.20% | 19.30% | -12.15% | 13.15% | 34.86% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 23.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAMC and SPY is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between PAMC and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PAMC vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAMC
SPY
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
PAMC
SPY
Technology
PAMC
SPY
Financial Services
PAMC
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
PAMC
SPY
Energy
PAMC
SPY
Basic Materials
PAMC
SPY
Real Estate
PAMC
SPY
Consumer Defensive
PAMC
SPY
Healthcare
PAMC
SPY
Utilities
PAMC
SPY
Communication Services
PAMC
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAMC vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
PAMC
SPY
PAMC vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAMC | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.39 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 3.01 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | 13.54 | -1.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAMC vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAMC drawdown since its inception was -27.04%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAMC and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAMC | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.04% | -55.19% | +28.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -8.88% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.07% | -18.76% | -7.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.61% | -24.50% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.75% | +1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.42% | -9.04% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 1.97% | +0.79% |
Volatility
PAMC vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.64%. This indicates that PAMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAMC | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 4.64% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.35% | 9.75% | +4.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.89% | 12.43% | +6.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 17.14% | +3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 17.99% | +2.73% |
PAMC vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAMC vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
PAMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.09% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAMC and SPY have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAMC has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to SPY (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAMC dropped -27.04% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.51% vs 9.70% for PAMC. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.51% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PAMC.
PAMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
PAMC is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. PAMC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PAMC and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAMC and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer