SSCP vs. ISCG
SSCP (SMART Small Cap ETF) and ISCG (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. SSCP is actively managed, while ISCG is passively managed. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SSCP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ISCG.
Performance
SSCP vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SSCP
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ISCG
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- YTD
- 18.02%
- 1Y
- 29.05%
- 3Y*
- 16.58%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.31M | $1.50M | $1.83M | |
| $30.14K | $47.47K | $106.93K |
SSCP vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SSCP SMART Small Cap ETF | 6.86% |
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 5.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSCP and ISCG is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSCP vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank
SSCP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ISCG
SSCP vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMART Small Cap ETF (SSCP) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSCP | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.55 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSCP vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSCP drawdown since its inception was -4.50%, smaller than the maximum ISCG drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCP and ISCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSCP | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -57.72% | +53.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.43% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -11.56% | +10.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.16% | — |
Volatility
SSCP vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSCP | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.07% | 18.71% | +0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 23.01% | -3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 23.16% | -4.09% |
SSCP vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSCP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSCP vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison
SSCP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.57% | 0.61% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.62% | 0.10% | 0.27% | 0.40% | 0.52% | 1.19% | 0.64% |
SSCP SMART Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSCP and ISCG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SSCP.
ISCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for SSCP.
They also come from different issuers: SmartWay and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SSCP and 0.06% for ISCG.
Find the right allocation for SSCP and ISCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer