SSCP vs. CAFG

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

SSCP (SMART Small Cap ETF) and CAFG (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. SSCP is actively managed, while CAFG is passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSCP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CAFG.

Performance

SSCP vs. CAFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SMART Small Cap ETF (SSCP) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SSCP

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 2.35%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAFG

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 2.12%
• 6M: 23.46%
• YTD: 31.34%
• 1Y: 38.77%
• 3Y*: 14.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCP vs. CAFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SSCP SMART Small Cap ETF	4.45%
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCP and CAFG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2026	0.60

Return for Risk

SSCP vs. CAFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CAFG

CAFG Risk / Return Rank: 87
CAFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CAFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CAFG Omega Ratio Rank: 80
CAFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CAFG Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCP vs. CAFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMART Small Cap ETF (SSCP) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSCP	CAFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.22	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.12	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.79	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.96	—

Drawdowns

SSCP vs. CAFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCP drawdown since its inception was -4.50%, smaller than the maximum CAFG drawdown of -23.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCP and CAFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSCP	CAFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.50%	-23.66%	+19.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.13%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-2.03%	+0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.13%	-5.36%	+4.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.44%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SSCP	CAFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.95%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.32%	17.58%	+1.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.32%	19.43%	-0.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.32%	19.43%	-0.11%

SSCP vs. CAFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CAFG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSCP vs. CAFG - Dividend Comparison

SSCP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.30%	0.35%	0.36%	0.39%
SSCP SMART Small Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSCP and CAFG in my portfolio?

SSCP and CAFG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SSCP or CAFG?

On fees, CAFG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SSCP or CAFG?

CAFG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SSCP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SSCP or CAFG?

CAFG has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.00% for SSCP.

What is the main difference between SSCP and CAFG?

They also come from different issuers: SmartWay ETFs and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SSCP and 0.59% for CAFG.