PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSCGX vs. NEAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SSCGX vs. NEAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SSCGX vs. NEAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSCGX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund
-0.80%4.30%16.63%13.71%-23.11%-9.33%22.69%21.23%-5.23%18.38%
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
11.92%26.40%14.31%37.65%-27.53%37.56%51.53%43.82%-16.09%8.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCGX achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly lower than NEAGX's 11.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCGX has underperformed NEAGX with an annualized return of 6.24%, while NEAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.04% annualized return.


SSCGX

1D
3.93%
1M
-7.20%
YTD
-0.80%
6M
-1.25%
1Y
14.65%
3Y*
9.91%
5Y*
-2.74%
10Y*
6.24%

NEAGX

1D
4.33%
1M
-7.75%
YTD
11.92%
6M
14.19%
1Y
60.51%
3Y*
26.85%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
18.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SSCGX vs. NEAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCGX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAGX's 1.86% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SSCGX vs. NEAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCGX
SSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

NEAGX
NEAGX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NEAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NEAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCGX vs. NEAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSCGXNEAGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

2.14

-1.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.05

2.71

-1.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.38

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

4.27

-3.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.35

15.19

-10.85

SSCGX vs. NEAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the NEAGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCGX and NEAGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSCGXNEAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

2.14

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.62

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.76

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.59

-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between SSCGX and NEAGX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SSCGX vs. NEAGX - Dividend Comparison

SSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.55%, more than NEAGX's 1.91% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSCGX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund
10.55%10.47%7.05%0.00%0.05%1.75%0.00%3.29%17.03%0.34%0.00%0.00%
NEAGX
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund
1.91%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.10%3.91%10.64%16.57%5.17%6.72%11.88%

Drawdowns

SSCGX vs. NEAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCGX drawdown since its inception was -71.03%, which is greater than NEAGX's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCGX and NEAGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SSCGXNEAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.03%

-41.80%

-29.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.09%

-14.01%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.84%

-36.31%

-10.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

-36.31%

-10.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.27%

-7.75%

-13.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.19%

-8.72%

-16.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

3.93%

-0.32%

Volatility

SSCGX vs. NEAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) is 8.87%, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund (NEAGX) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that SSCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SSCGXNEAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.87%

11.64%

-2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.19%

19.84%

-4.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.02%

28.93%

-5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.53%

24.33%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.63%

23.90%

-0.27%