PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSCGX vs. NESIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SSCGX vs. NESIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SSCGX vs. NESIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSCGX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund
-4.55%4.30%16.63%13.71%-23.11%-9.33%22.69%21.23%-5.23%18.06%
NESIX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional
9.63%11.16%13.47%5.85%-29.71%11.36%73.06%55.28%-4.87%12.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCGX achieves a -4.55% return, which is significantly lower than NESIX's 9.63% return.


SSCGX

1D
-2.22%
1M
-9.68%
YTD
-4.55%
6M
-5.16%
1Y
10.39%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
-3.20%
10Y*
5.83%

NESIX

1D
-4.46%
1M
-7.08%
YTD
9.63%
6M
12.40%
1Y
48.73%
3Y*
11.47%
5Y*
1.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SSCGX vs. NESIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCGX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than NESIX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SSCGX vs. NESIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCGX
SSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

NESIX
NESIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NESIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NESIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
NESIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NESIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NESIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCGX vs. NESIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSCGXNESIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

1.34

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.85

1.91

-1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.25

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

2.44

-1.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.55

8.21

-5.66

SSCGX vs. NESIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the NESIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCGX and NESIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSCGXNESIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

1.34

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.04

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.53

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between SSCGX and NESIX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SSCGX vs. NESIX - Dividend Comparison

SSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.97%, while NESIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSCGX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund
10.97%10.47%7.05%0.00%0.05%1.75%0.00%3.29%17.03%0.34%
NESIX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.93%23.92%13.26%8.25%21.96%8.89%

Drawdowns

SSCGX vs. NESIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCGX drawdown since its inception was -71.03%, which is greater than NESIX's maximum drawdown of -49.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCGX and NESIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SSCGXNESIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.03%

-49.61%

-21.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.09%

-17.25%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.84%

-49.61%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.24%

-9.15%

-15.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.19%

-15.27%

-9.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

5.12%

-1.54%

Volatility

SSCGX vs. NESIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) is 7.88%, while Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX) has a volatility of 10.99%. This indicates that SSCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NESIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SSCGXNESIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.88%

10.99%

-3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.69%

22.90%

-8.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.74%

35.06%

-12.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.47%

29.10%

-5.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.60%

26.30%

-2.70%