SSCGX vs. NASDX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SSCGX (SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund) and NASDX (Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares) are both mutual funds - SSCGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while NASDX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, SSCGX returned 8.16%/yr vs 23.09%/yr for NASDX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSCGX charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for NASDX.

Performance

SSCGX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SSCGX having a 19.63% return and NASDX slightly higher at 20.21%. Over the past 10 years, SSCGX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 8.16%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.09% annualized return.

SSCGX

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 4.79%
• YTD: 19.63%
• 6M: 16.34%
• 1Y: 31.31%
• 3Y*: 16.37%
• 5Y*: 0.62%
• 10Y*: 8.16%

NASDX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 3.00%
• YTD: 20.21%
• 6M: 18.70%
• 1Y: 39.39%
• 3Y*: 31.17%
• 5Y*: 18.92%
• 10Y*: 23.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCGX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SSCGX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund	19.63%	4.30%	16.63%	13.71%	-23.11%	-9.33%	22.69%	21.23%	-5.23%	18.38%
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares	20.21%	21.00%	36.91%	54.69%	-32.57%	27.32%	48.59%	38.22%	-1.21%	31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCGX and NASDX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2000	0.81

The correlation between SSCGX and NASDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (3 years) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SSCGX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCGX

SSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
SSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
SSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
SSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

NASDX

NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 71
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCGX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSCGX	NASDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	2.32	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	3.01	-0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.40	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	3.45	-0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.48	12.98	-2.49

SSCGX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCGX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SSCGX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCGX drawdown since its inception was -71.03%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCGX and NASDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSCGX	NASDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.03%	-83.16%	+12.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.57%	-11.90%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.27%	-22.71%	-4.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.84%	-35.33%	-11.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.84%	-35.33%	-11.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.05%	-0.96%	-4.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.09%	-34.30%	+9.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	3.16%	-0.02%

Volatility

SSCGX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) is 6.51%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 8.36%. This indicates that SSCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSCGX	NASDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	8.36%	-1.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.68%	14.19%	+1.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.36%	17.74%	+2.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.69%	23.29%	+0.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.76%	22.81%	+0.95%

SSCGX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCGX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSCGX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

SSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.75%, more than NASDX's 3.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares	3.01%	3.76%	16.95%	7.61%	3.75%	2.59%	1.28%	7.09%	2.47%	1.65%	0.75%	0.85%
SSCGX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund	8.75%	10.47%	7.05%	0.00%	0.05%	1.75%	0.00%	3.29%	17.03%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSCGX and NASDX in my portfolio?

SSCGX and NASDX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SSCGX or NASDX?

NASDX has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to SSCGX (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCGX dropped -71.03% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.