Correlation
The correlation between SSCGX and SCHG is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
SSCGX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
SSCGX is managed by Blackrock. It was launched on Apr 20, 1992. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SSCGX or SCHG.
Performance
SSCGX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
SSCGX:
0.04
SCHG:
0.68
SSCGX:
0.21
SCHG:
0.98
SSCGX:
1.03
SCHG:
1.13
SSCGX:
0.02
SCHG:
0.63
SSCGX:
0.07
SCHG:
2.07
SSCGX:
10.16%
SCHG:
7.13%
SSCGX:
24.81%
SCHG:
25.37%
SSCGX:
-69.16%
SCHG:
-34.59%
SSCGX:
-14.62%
SCHG:
-5.20%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSCGX achieves a -6.41% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCGX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 6.08%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.84% annualized return.
SSCGX
-6.41%
5.72%
-14.41%
1.07%
5.09%
9.46%
6.08%
SCHG
-1.01%
7.20%
-0.61%
17.22%
21.07%
18.23%
15.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSCGX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSCGX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SSCGX vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SSCGX
SCHG
SSCGX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
SSCGX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
SSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than SCHG's 0.41% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSCGX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund | 7.54% | 7.05% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 26.34% | 0.00% | 3.29% | 17.03% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
SSCGX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSCGX drawdown since its inception was -69.16%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCGX and SCHG.
Loading data...
Volatility
SSCGX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 5.50% and 5.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...