PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SROI vs. CCEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SROI vs. CCEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SROI vs. CCEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SROI
Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF
-1.85%16.36%11.46%
CCEF
Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF
-0.86%13.47%18.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SROI achieves a -1.85% return, which is significantly lower than CCEF's -0.86% return.


SROI

1D
-0.33%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
-1.85%
6M
-0.78%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
10.76%
5Y*
10Y*

CCEF

1D
-0.38%
1M
-4.14%
YTD
-0.86%
6M
0.98%
1Y
9.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SROI vs. CCEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SROI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CCEF's 2.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SROI vs. CCEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SROI
SROI Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SROI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SROI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SROI Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SROI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SROI Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

CCEF
CCEF Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SROI vs. CCEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SROICCEFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

0.74

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.35

1.02

+0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

0.85

+0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.79

3.83

+1.96

SROI vs. CCEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SROI Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the CCEF Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SROI and CCEF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SROICCEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

0.74

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

1.29

-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between SROI and CCEF is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SROI vs. CCEF - Dividend Comparison

SROI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than CCEF's 8.38% yield.


TTM202520242023
SROI
Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF
0.61%0.60%0.68%0.94%
CCEF
Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF
8.38%8.08%6.55%0.00%

Drawdowns

SROI vs. CCEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SROI drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, which is greater than CCEF's maximum drawdown of -13.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SROI and CCEF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SROICCEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.38%

-13.25%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-9.37%

-0.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.70%

-5.57%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-1.36%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.53%

+0.08%

Volatility

SROI vs. CCEF - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) at 4.47%. This indicates that SROI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SROICCEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

4.47%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

6.54%

+3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

12.79%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.75%

10.93%

+2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.75%

10.93%

+2.82%