PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SROI vs. CBOJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SROI vs. CBOJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SROI achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly higher than CBOJ's -1.58% return.


SROI

1D
1.73%
1M
1.95%
YTD
11.28%
6M
12.30%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
10Y*

CBOJ

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
-1.58%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
-3.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SROI vs. CBOJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SROI and CBOJ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SROI vs. CBOJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SROI
SROI Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SROI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SROI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SROI Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SROI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SROI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

CBOJ
CBOJ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CBOJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBOJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBOJ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CBOJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBOJ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SROI vs. CBOJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SROICBOJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.87

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

-0.49

+2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

-0.75

+9.62

SROI vs. CBOJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SROI Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the CBOJ Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SROI and CBOJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SROI vs. CBOJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SROI drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, which is greater than CBOJ's maximum drawdown of -8.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SROI and CBOJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SROICBOJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.38%

-8.13%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-8.13%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-7.90%

+7.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-3.27%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

5.30%

-2.90%

Volatility

SROI vs. CBOJ - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) at 0.86%. This indicates that SROI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBOJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SROICBOJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

0.86%

+4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

2.34%

+9.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.01%

4.89%

+9.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.01%

4.53%

+9.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.01%

4.53%

+9.48%

SROI vs. CBOJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SROI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOJ's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

SROI vs. CBOJ - Dividend Comparison

SROI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than CBOJ's 3.21% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SROI and CBOJ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SROI has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to CBOJ (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SROI dropped -15.38% vs CBOJ's -8.13%.

On 1-year performance, SROI leads with 21.24% vs -3.99% for CBOJ. On fees, CBOJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CBOJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SROI has performed better with a 21.24% return vs -3.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CBOJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SROI.

CBOJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 0.54% for SROI.

SROI is categorized as Global Equities, while CBOJ is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SROI and 0.69% for CBOJ.

SROI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SROI and CBOJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer