SROI vs. CAIQ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ).

SROI and CAIQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SROI is an actively managed fund by Calamos. It was launched on Feb 3, 2023. CAIQ is a passively managed fund by Calamos that tracks the performance of the MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index. It was launched on Nov 20, 2024.

Performance

SROI vs. CAIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SROI vs. CAIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF	-2.52%	4.56%
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF	-4.16%	4.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SROI achieves a -2.52% return, which is significantly higher than CAIQ's -4.16% return.

SROI

• 1D: 3.19%
• 1M: -7.03%
• YTD: -2.52%
• 6M: -0.45%
• 1Y: 14.72%
• 3Y*: 10.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAIQ

• 1D: 3.02%
• 1M: -3.99%
• YTD: -4.16%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SROI vs. CAIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SROI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CAIQ's 0.74% expense ratio.

SROI

Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF

CAIQ

Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF

Return for Risk

SROI vs. CAIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SROI

SROI Risk / Return Rank: 51
SROI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SROI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
SROI Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SROI Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
SROI Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SROI vs. CAIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SROI	CAIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.79	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SROI	CAIQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	-0.06	+0.80

Correlation

The correlation between SROI and CAIQ is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SROI vs. CAIQ - Dividend Comparison

SROI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than CAIQ's 4.82% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF	0.62%	0.60%	0.68%	0.94%
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF	4.82%	1.54%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SROI vs. CAIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SROI drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, which is greater than CAIQ's maximum drawdown of -9.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SROI and CAIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SROI	CAIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.38%	-9.06%	-6.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.33%	-6.31%	-1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.48%	-2.18%	-0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SROI	CAIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.49%	14.16%	+2.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.75%	14.16%	-0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.75%	14.16%	-0.41%