PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SQY vs. GOOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SQY vs. GOOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SQY achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly lower than GOOP's 12.36% return.


SQY

1D
-5.22%
1M
-4.39%
YTD
-1.01%
6M
6.08%
1Y
-0.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOP

1D
-0.95%
1M
-7.01%
YTD
12.36%
6M
10.67%
1Y
93.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SQY vs. GOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SQY
YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF
-1.01%-29.43%21.72%33.88%
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
12.36%52.46%27.67%6.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SQY and GOOP is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023

0.37

The correlation between SQY and GOOP shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SQY vs. GOOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SQY
SQY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQY Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQY Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOP
GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SQY vs. GOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SQYGOOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.57

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

4.04

-4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.01

15.39

-15.40

SQY vs. GOOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SQY Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the GOOP Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SQY and GOOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SQYGOOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

3.34

-3.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

1.51

-1.32

Drawdowns

SQY vs. GOOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQY drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, which is greater than GOOP's maximum drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQY and GOOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SQYGOOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.30%

-27.49%

-24.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.72%

-23.32%

-14.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.84%

-11.90%

-25.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.82%

-6.29%

-15.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.18%

6.12%

+11.06%

Volatility

SQY vs. GOOP - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) has a higher volatility of 10.82% compared to Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) at 9.14%. This indicates that SQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SQYGOOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.82%

9.14%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.08%

22.59%

+8.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.83%

28.30%

+10.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.20%

25.91%

+16.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.20%

25.91%

+16.29%

SQY vs. GOOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SQY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOP's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SQY vs. GOOP - Dividend Comparison

SQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.42%, more than GOOP's 12.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
12.25%11.79%13.73%2.06%
SQY
YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF
109.42%95.35%62.54%9.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


SQY and GOOP have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SQY has higher volatility (10.82%) compared to GOOP (9.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQY dropped -52.30% vs GOOP's -27.49%.

On 1-year performance, GOOP leads with 93.82% vs -0.20% for SQY. On fees, GOOP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, GOOP has been the lower-risk option at 9.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOP has performed better with a 93.82% return vs -0.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOOP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SQY.

SQY has the higher dividend yield at 109.42%, compared with 12.25% for GOOP.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SQY and 0.99% for GOOP.

GOOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SQY and GOOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer