SQY vs. GOOP
SQY (YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF) and GOOP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SQY returned -0.20% vs 93.82% for GOOP. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SQY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GOOP.
Performance
SQY vs. GOOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQY achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly lower than GOOP's 12.36% return.
SQY
- 1D
- -5.22%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- -0.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOP
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -7.01%
- YTD
- 12.36%
- 6M
- 10.67%
- 1Y
- 93.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SQY vs. GOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | -1.01% | -29.43% | 21.72% | 33.88% |
GOOP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF | 12.36% | 52.46% | 27.67% | 6.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQY and GOOP is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.37 |
The correlation between SQY and GOOP shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQY vs. GOOP — Risk / Return Rank
SQY
GOOP
SQY vs. GOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SQY | GOOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.57 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 4.04 | -4.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 15.39 | -15.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SQY | GOOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 3.34 | -3.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 1.51 | -1.32 |
Drawdowns
SQY vs. GOOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQY drawdown since its inception was -52.30%, which is greater than GOOP's maximum drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQY and GOOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQY | GOOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.30% | -27.49% | -24.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.72% | -23.32% | -14.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.84% | -11.90% | -25.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.82% | -6.29% | -15.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.18% | 6.12% | +11.06% |
Volatility
SQY vs. GOOP - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF (SQY) has a higher volatility of 10.82% compared to Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) at 9.14%. This indicates that SQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQY | GOOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.82% | 9.14% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.08% | 22.59% | +8.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.83% | 28.30% | +10.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.20% | 25.91% | +16.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.20% | 25.91% | +16.29% |
SQY vs. GOOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOP's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQY vs. GOOP - Dividend Comparison
SQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.42%, more than GOOP's 12.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF | 12.25% | 11.79% | 13.73% | 2.06% |
SQY YieldMax SQ Option Income Strategy ETF | 109.42% | 95.35% | 62.54% | 9.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQY and GOOP have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQY has higher volatility (10.82%) compared to GOOP (9.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQY dropped -52.30% vs GOOP's -27.49%.
On 1-year performance, GOOP leads with 93.82% vs -0.20% for SQY. On fees, GOOP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, GOOP has been the lower-risk option at 9.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOP has performed better with a 93.82% return vs -0.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GOOP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SQY.
SQY has the higher dividend yield at 109.42%, compared with 12.25% for GOOP.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SQY and 0.99% for GOOP.
GOOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQY and GOOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer