PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOOP vs. GOOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOOP vs. GOOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) and Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOP achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly lower than GOOW's 13.56% return.


GOOP

1D
5.31%
1M
-3.26%
6M
1.53%
YTD
8.89%
1Y
62.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
34.56%

GOOW

1D
7.98%
1M
-1.82%
6M
3.91%
YTD
13.56%
1Y
103.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
92.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$440.60K$549.46K$838.71K
$1.99M$1.77M$2.25M

GOOP vs. GOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GOOP and GOOW is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.95

The correlation between GOOP and GOOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOOP vs. GOOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GOOP
GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOW
GOOW Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GOOP vs. GOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) and Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOOPGOOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

3.95

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.41

10.85

-3.44

GOOP vs. GOOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the GOOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOP and GOOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GOOP vs. GOOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOP drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, which is greater than GOOW's maximum drawdown of -25.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOP and GOOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOOPGOOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.49%

-25.44%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.32%

-25.44%

+2.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.63%

-14.60%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.70%

-6.41%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.23%

9.24%

-1.01%

Volatility

GOOP vs. GOOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) is 12.82%, while Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW) has a volatility of 15.50%. This indicates that GOOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOOPGOOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.82%

15.50%

-2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.67%

30.46%

-3.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.51%

39.64%

-8.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.99%

39.39%

-12.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.99%

39.39%

-12.40%

GOOP vs. GOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GOOP and GOOW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

GOOP vs. GOOW - Dividend Comparison

GOOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.43%, less than GOOW's 42.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
13.43%11.79%13.73%2.06%
GOOW
Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF
42.80%19.77%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, GOOP and GOOW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GOOW has higher volatility (15.50%) compared to GOOP (12.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOP dropped -27.49% vs GOOW's -25.44%.

On 1-year performance, GOOW leads with 103.29% vs 62.66% for GOOP. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GOOP has been the lower-risk option at 12.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOW has performed better with a 103.29% return vs 62.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOOP and GOOW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

GOOW has the higher dividend yield at 42.80%, compared with 13.43% for GOOP.

They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Roundhill.

GOOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOOP and GOOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer