GOOP vs. AAPY
GOOP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF) and AAPY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOOP is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while AAPY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Kurv. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GOOP returned 93.32% vs 46.98% for AAPY. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
GOOP vs. AAPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOOP achieves a 13.44% return, which is significantly lower than AAPY's 16.46% return.
GOOP
- 1D
- -4.43%
- 1M
- -6.77%
- YTD
- 13.44%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 93.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPY
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- 13.83%
- YTD
- 16.46%
- 6M
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 46.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOP vs. AAPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF | 13.44% | 52.46% | 27.67% | 6.17% |
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF | 16.46% | 5.04% | 20.54% | 4.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOOP and AAPY is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOOP vs. AAPY — Risk / Return Rank
GOOP
AAPY
GOOP vs. AAPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOOP | AAPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.32 | 2.21 | +1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.33 | 2.98 | +1.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.41 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 3.25 | +0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.95 | 8.84 | +6.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOOP | AAPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32 | 2.21 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.90 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
GOOP vs. AAPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOOP drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, smaller than the maximum AAPY drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOP and AAPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOOP | AAPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.49% | -29.22% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.32% | -14.47% | -8.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.06% | 0.00% | -11.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.28% | -6.35% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.07% | 5.32% | +0.75% |
Volatility
GOOP vs. AAPY - Volatility Comparison
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) has a higher volatility of 9.12% compared to Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) at 6.18%. This indicates that GOOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOOP | AAPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.12% | 6.18% | +2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.63% | 17.72% | +4.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.32% | 21.35% | +6.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.92% | 22.57% | +3.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.92% | 22.57% | +3.35% |
GOOP vs. AAPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GOOP and AAPY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
GOOP vs. AAPY - Dividend Comparison
GOOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.13%, more than AAPY's 11.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF | 11.12% | 12.66% | 17.15% | 2.16% |
GOOP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF | 12.13% | 11.79% | 13.73% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOOP and AAPY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOP has higher volatility (9.12%) compared to AAPY (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOOP dropped -27.49% vs AAPY's -29.22%.
On 1-year performance, GOOP leads with 93.32% vs 46.98% for AAPY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, AAPY has been the lower-risk option at 6.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GOOP has performed better with a 93.32% return vs 46.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GOOP and AAPY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
GOOP has the higher dividend yield at 12.13%, compared with 11.12% for AAPY.
GOOP is categorized as Derivative Income, while AAPY is Large Cap Blend Equities.
GOOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GOOP and AAPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer