SQS vs. GXTG
SQS (Sapient Quality Select ETF) and GXTG (Global X Thematic Growth ETF) are both Global Equities funds. SQS is actively managed, while GXTG is passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SQS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GXTG.
Performance
SQS vs. GXTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SQS
- 1D
- -3.19%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXTG
- 1D
- -8.52%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- YTD
- 12.91%
- 6M
- 7.36%
- 1Y
- 8.67%
- 3Y*
- 2.90%
- 5Y*
- -9.76%
- 10Y*
- —
SQS vs. GXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SQS Sapient Quality Select ETF | 8.21% |
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 15.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQS and GXTG is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQS vs. GXTG — Risk / Return Rank
SQS
GXTG
SQS vs. GXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS) and Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SQS | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.24 | 0.06 | +2.18 |
Drawdowns
SQS vs. GXTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQS drawdown since its inception was -7.18%, smaller than the maximum GXTG drawdown of -67.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQS and GXTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQS | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -67.81% | +60.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.14% | -55.37% | +51.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.20% | -43.10% | +41.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.38% | — |
Volatility
SQS vs. GXTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQS | GXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.82% | 26.96% | -8.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 27.88% | -9.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 29.76% | -10.94% |
SQS vs. GXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GXTG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQS vs. GXTG - Dividend Comparison
SQS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXTG Global X Thematic Growth ETF | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% |
SQS Sapient Quality Select ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQS and GXTG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SQS.
GXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.00% for SQS.
They also come from different issuers: Sapient and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SQS and 0.50% for GXTG.
Find the right allocation for SQS and GXTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer