PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SQS vs. VEGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SQS vs. VEGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SQS

1D
-3.19%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VEGA

1D
-2.16%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
5.08%
6M
4.90%
1Y
16.16%
3Y*
13.12%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
7.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SQS vs. VEGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SQS and VEGA is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2026

0.92

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SQS vs. VEGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SQS

VEGA
VEGA Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VEGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEGA Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VEGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEGA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SQS vs. VEGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SQS vs. VEGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SQSVEGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.24

0.51

+1.73

Drawdowns

SQS vs. VEGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQS drawdown since its inception was -7.18%, smaller than the maximum VEGA drawdown of -28.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQS and VEGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SQSVEGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-28.37%

+21.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.14%

-2.39%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.20%

-3.79%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

Volatility

SQS vs. VEGA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SQSVEGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.82%

9.33%

+9.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.82%

12.32%

+6.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.82%

12.72%

+6.10%

SQS vs. VEGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SQS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than VEGA's 2.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

SQS vs. VEGA - Dividend Comparison

SQS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SQS
Sapient Quality Select ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEGA
AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF
1.28%1.34%1.05%1.12%1.89%0.55%0.28%0.44%0.45%0.00%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SQS and VEGA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SQS is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SQS is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 2.02% for VEGA.

VEGA has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.00% for SQS.

They also come from different issuers: Sapient and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SQS and 2.02% for VEGA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SQS and VEGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer