SQM vs. SANM
SQM (Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.) and SANM (Sanmina Corporation) are both stocks. SQM operates in Chemicals (Basic Materials), while SANM operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, SQM returned 15.25%/yr vs 22.12%/yr for SANM. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SQM vs. SANM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQM achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than SANM's 39.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SQM has underperformed SANM with an annualized return of 15.25%, while SANM has yielded a comparatively higher 22.12% annualized return.
SQM
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 1Y
- 97.06%
- 3Y*
- -1.04%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.25%
SANM
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -18.19%
- 6M
- 36.10%
- YTD
- 39.13%
- 1Y
- 100.43%
- 3Y*
- 49.61%
- 5Y*
- 40.23%
- 10Y*
- 22.12%
SQM vs. SANM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 7.59% | 89.55% | -39.35% | -18.47% | 71.62% | 6.82% | 89.19% | -27.30% | -32.71% | 115.00% |
SANM Sanmina Corporation | 39.13% | 98.32% | 47.30% | -10.33% | 38.18% | 30.01% | -6.86% | 42.31% | -27.09% | -9.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQM and SANM is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 1993 | 0.26 |
The correlation between SQM and SANM shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SQM:
$20.91B
SANM:
$11.19B
SQM:
$2.86
SANM:
$4.71
SQM:
25.57
SANM:
44.32
SQM:
0.15
SANM:
8.64
SQM:
3.93
SANM:
1.01
SQM:
3.56
SANM:
1.64
SQM:
$5.31B
SANM:
$11.34B
SQM:
$1.83B
SANM:
$968.36M
SQM:
$1.75B
SANM:
$365.81M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQM vs. SANM — Risk / Return Rank
SQM
SANM
SQM vs. SANM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) and Sanmina Corporation (SANM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQM | SANM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 3.08 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.18 | 7.23 | +1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQM vs. SANM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQM drawdown since its inception was -78.34%, smaller than the maximum SANM drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQM and SANM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQM | SANM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.34% | -99.66% | +21.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.18% | -32.69% | +6.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.32% | -32.69% | -28.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.76% | -33.92% | -35.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.98% | -55.85% | -17.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.34% | -41.02% | +15.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.30% | -71.34% | +41.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.81% | 13.90% | -4.09% |
Volatility
SQM vs. SANM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) is 13.76%, while Sanmina Corporation (SANM) has a volatility of 20.08%. This indicates that SQM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SANM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQM | SANM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.76% | 20.08% | -6.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.59% | 51.02% | -14.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.12% | 70.13% | -19.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.85% | 45.10% | +4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.15% | 42.31% | +3.84% |
Dividends
SQM vs. SANM - Dividend Comparison
SQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while SANM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SANM Sanmina Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 1.58% | 0.18% | 0.59% | 8.34% | 9.66% | 3.92% | 1.64% | 4.55% | 5.37% | 2.73% | 4.77% | 2.00% |
Financials
SQM vs. SANM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. and Sanmina Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SQM vs. SANM - Profitability Comparison
SQM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a gross profit of 778.60M and revenue of 1.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.
SANM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported a gross profit of 354.98M and revenue of 4.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.9%.
SQM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported an operating income of 729.70M and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.5%.
SANM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported an operating income of 157.01M and revenue of 4.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.
SQM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a net income of 364.70M and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.
SANM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported a net income of 93.65M and revenue of 4.01B, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SQM and SANM have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SANM has higher volatility (20.08%) compared to SQM (13.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQM dropped -78.34% vs SANM's -99.66%.
SQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQM and SANM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer