SANM vs. FLEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Sanmina Corporation (SANM) and Flex Ltd. (FLEX).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SANM or FLEX.
Key characteristics
| SANM | FLEX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 52.99% | 173.30% |
| 1Y Return | 57.78% | 210.62% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 25.19% | 63.91% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 19.29% | 47.05% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.11% | 22.38% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.49 | 2.72 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.56 | 6.23 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.34 | 1.78 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.75 | 5.13 |
| Martin Ratio | 9.59 | 33.41 |
| Ulcer Index | 6.76% | 6.59% |
| Daily Std Dev | 43.53% | 80.91% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.66% | -96.37% |
| Current Drawdown | -77.80% | -5.56% |
Fundamentals
| SANM | FLEX | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.41B | $14.72B |
| EPS | $3.91 | $2.08 |
| PE Ratio | 20.65 | 18.25 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.90 | 0.97 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $7.57B | $24.48B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $640.43M | $2.03B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $436.04M | $1.47B |
Correlation
The correlation between SANM and FLEX is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SANM vs. FLEX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SANM achieves a 52.99% return, which is significantly lower than FLEX's 173.30% return. Over the past 10 years, SANM has underperformed FLEX with an annualized return of 12.11%, while FLEX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.38% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SANM vs. FLEX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sanmina Corporation (SANM) and Flex Ltd. (FLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SANM vs. FLEX - Dividend Comparison
SANM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.82%.
| TTM | |
|---|---|
SANM Sanmina Corporation | 0.00% |
FLEX Flex Ltd. | 21.82% |
Drawdowns
SANM vs. FLEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SANM drawdown since its inception was -99.66%, roughly equal to the maximum FLEX drawdown of -96.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SANM and FLEX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SANM vs. FLEX - Volatility Comparison
Sanmina Corporation (SANM) has a higher volatility of 14.39% compared to Flex Ltd. (FLEX) at 11.05%. This indicates that SANM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SANM vs. FLEX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sanmina Corporation and Flex Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities