SANM vs. FLEX

In the year-to-date period, SANM achieves a 9.65% return, which is significantly lower than FLEX's 11.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SANM has underperformed FLEX with an annualized return of 13.66%, while FLEX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.01% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sanmina Corporation (SANM) and Flex Ltd. (FLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SANM Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the FLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SANM and FLEX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither SANM nor FLEX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum SANM drawdown since its inception was -99.66%, roughly equal to the maximum FLEX drawdown of -96.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SANM and FLEX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Sanmina Corporation (SANM) is 5.92%, while Flex Ltd. (FLEX) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that SANM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sanmina Corporation and Flex Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.