PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SANM vs. VICR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SANM vs. VICR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sanmina Corporation (SANM) and Vicor Corporation (VICR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SANM achieves a 68.89% return, which is significantly lower than VICR's 233.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SANM has underperformed VICR with an annualized return of 25.40%, while VICR has yielded a comparatively higher 42.71% annualized return.


SANM

1D
4.95%
1M
2.84%
YTD
68.89%
6M
65.77%
1Y
182.08%
3Y*
64.62%
5Y*
45.86%
10Y*
25.40%

VICR

1D
10.31%
1M
36.40%
YTD
233.51%
6M
229.25%
1Y
729.43%
3Y*
90.26%
5Y*
30.65%
10Y*
42.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SANM vs. VICR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SANM
Sanmina Corporation
68.89%98.32%47.30%-10.33%38.18%30.01%-6.86%42.31%-27.09%-9.96%
VICR
Vicor Corporation
233.51%126.82%7.52%-16.39%-57.67%37.69%97.39%23.63%80.81%38.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SANM and VICR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 1993

0.35

The correlation between SANM and VICR shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.50 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SANM:

$14.02B

VICR:

$17.27B

EPS

SANM:

$4.72

VICR:

$2.98

PE Ratio

SANM:

53.65

VICR:

122.71

PEG Ratio

SANM:

10.46

VICR:

0.28

PS Ratio

SANM:

1.23

VICR:

35.56

PB Ratio

SANM:

1.99

VICR:

22.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

SANM:

$11.34B

VICR:

$471.70M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SANM:

$968.36M

VICR:

$277.43M

EBITDA (TTM)

SANM:

$365.81M

VICR:

$130.39M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SANM vs. VICR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SANM
SANM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SANM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SANM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SANM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SANM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SANM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

VICR
VICR Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
VICR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VICR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
VICR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
VICR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VICR Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SANM vs. VICR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sanmina Corporation (SANM) and Vicor Corporation (VICR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SANMVICRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.74

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.60

23.00

-17.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.88

81.01

-67.13

SANM vs. VICR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SANM Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is lower than the VICR Sharpe Ratio of 8.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SANM and VICR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SANM vs. VICR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SANM drawdown since its inception was -99.66%, which is greater than VICR's maximum drawdown of -92.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SANM and VICR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SANMVICRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.66%

-92.26%

-7.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.69%

-32.01%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.69%

-66.55%

+33.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.92%

-80.47%

+46.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.85%

-80.47%

+24.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.40%

0.00%

-28.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.40%

-58.40%

-13.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.18%

9.07%

+4.11%

Volatility

SANM vs. VICR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sanmina Corporation (SANM) is 18.87%, while Vicor Corporation (VICR) has a volatility of 30.37%. This indicates that SANM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VICR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SANMVICRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.87%

30.37%

-11.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.93%

66.94%

-18.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.46%

84.49%

-16.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.58%

72.82%

-28.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.13%

63.94%

-21.81%

Dividends

SANM vs. VICR - Dividend Comparison

Neither SANM nor VICR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SANM vs. VICR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sanmina Corporation and Vicor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
4.01B
112.97M
(SANM) Total Revenue
(VICR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SANM vs. VICR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sanmina Corporation and Vicor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
8.9%
55.2%
Portfolio components
SANM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported a gross profit of 354.98M and revenue of 4.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.9%.

VICR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vicor Corporation reported a gross profit of 62.37M and revenue of 112.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

SANM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported an operating income of 157.01M and revenue of 4.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.

VICR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vicor Corporation reported an operating income of 16.88M and revenue of 112.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.0%.

SANM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported a net income of 93.65M and revenue of 4.01B, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.

VICR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vicor Corporation reported a net income of 20.66M and revenue of 112.97M, resulting in a net margin of 18.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SANM and VICR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VICR has higher volatility (30.37%) compared to SANM (18.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SANM dropped -99.66% vs VICR's -92.26%.

VICR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.73 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SANM and VICR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer