PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SANM vs. FN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between SANM and FN is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

SANM vs. FN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sanmina Corporation (SANM) and Fabrinet (FN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%2,500.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
391.28%
1,608.47%
SANM
FN

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SANM:

0.80

FN:

0.10

Sortino Ratio

SANM:

1.30

FN:

0.58

Omega Ratio

SANM:

1.18

FN:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

SANM:

0.35

FN:

0.17

Martin Ratio

SANM:

3.37

FN:

0.39

Ulcer Index

SANM:

8.70%

FN:

16.21%

Daily Std Dev

SANM:

36.55%

FN:

63.06%

Max Drawdown

SANM:

-99.66%

FN:

-70.46%

Current Drawdown

SANM:

-78.84%

FN:

-32.85%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SANM:

$4.07B

FN:

$6.72B

EPS

SANM:

$4.09

FN:

$8.80

PE Ratio

SANM:

18.32

FN:

20.87

PEG Ratio

SANM:

0.83

FN:

1.19

PS Ratio

SANM:

0.53

FN:

2.15

PB Ratio

SANM:

1.81

FN:

3.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

SANM:

$5.87B

FN:

$2.39B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SANM:

$492.75M

FN:

$295.24M

EBITDA (TTM)

SANM:

$360.53M

FN:

$298.87M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SANM achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly higher than FN's -16.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SANM has underperformed FN with an annualized return of 13.77%, while FN has yielded a comparatively higher 25.75% annualized return.


SANM

YTD

-0.99%

1M

-4.26%

6M

11.09%

1Y

28.68%

5Y*

23.28%

10Y*

13.77%

FN

YTD

-16.47%

1M

-18.20%

6M

-24.43%

1Y

11.17%

5Y*

24.52%

10Y*

25.75%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SANM vs. FN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SANM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SANM is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SANM is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SANM is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SANM is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SANM is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SANM is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FN is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FN is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FN is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FN is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FN is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FN is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SANM vs. FN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sanmina Corporation (SANM) and Fabrinet (FN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SANM, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
SANM: 0.80
FN: 0.10
The chart of Sortino ratio for SANM, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
SANM: 1.30
FN: 0.58
The chart of Omega ratio for SANM, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
SANM: 1.18
FN: 1.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for SANM, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
SANM: 1.15
FN: 0.17
The chart of Martin ratio for SANM, currently valued at 3.37, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
SANM: 3.37
FN: 0.39

The current SANM Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the FN Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SANM and FN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.80
0.10
SANM
FN

Dividends

SANM vs. FN - Dividend Comparison

Neither SANM nor FN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SANM vs. FN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SANM drawdown since its inception was -99.66%, which is greater than FN's maximum drawdown of -70.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SANM and FN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-17.23%
-32.85%
SANM
FN

Volatility

SANM vs. FN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sanmina Corporation (SANM) is 17.89%, while Fabrinet (FN) has a volatility of 27.31%. This indicates that SANM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.89%
27.31%
SANM
FN

Financials

SANM vs. FN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sanmina Corporation and Fabrinet. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab