SQLV vs. FLJH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH).

SQLV and FLJH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SQLV is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jul 12, 2017. FLJH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017.

Performance

SQLV vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SQLV vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF	2.33%	2.50%	4.76%	21.21%	-12.86%	37.14%	7.13%	17.41%	-10.55%	5.23%
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	6.40%	25.26%	25.89%	36.02%	-2.75%	12.68%	10.65%	20.34%	-14.66%	1.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SQLV achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 6.40% return.

SQLV

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -3.07%
• YTD: 2.33%
• 6M: 3.74%
• 1Y: 17.85%
• 3Y*: 8.87%
• 5Y*: 5.25%
• 10Y*: —

FLJH

• 1D: 2.17%
• 1M: -7.04%
• YTD: 6.40%
• 6M: 13.61%
• 1Y: 35.61%
• 3Y*: 27.63%
• 5Y*: 17.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SQLV vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SQLV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio.

SQLV

Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF

FLJH

Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF

Return for Risk

SQLV vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SQLV

SQLV Risk / Return Rank: 48
SQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
SQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 49

FLJH

FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 86
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SQLV vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SQLV	FLJH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	1.56	-0.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	2.18	-0.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.32	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	2.83	-1.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.69	10.73	-6.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SQLV vs. FLJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SQLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SQLV and FLJH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SQLV	FLJH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	1.56	-0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.97	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.68	-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between SQLV and FLJH is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SQLV vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

SQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than FLJH's 3.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF	1.11%	1.15%	1.11%	1.09%	1.24%	1.12%	1.22%	1.20%	1.08%	0.40%
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	3.67%	3.90%	5.06%	25.59%	26.67%	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	5.92%	0.10%

Drawdowns

SQLV vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQLV drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, which is greater than FLJH's maximum drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQLV and FLJH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SQLV	FLJH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.34%	-31.51%	-16.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.92%	-11.83%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.86%	-20.39%	-6.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.16%	-7.52%	+2.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.10%	-5.39%	-3.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.79%	3.23%	+0.56%

Volatility

SQLV vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) is 5.25%, while Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) has a volatility of 8.09%. This indicates that SQLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SQLV	FLJH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.25%	8.09%	-2.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.40%	14.31%	-1.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.07%	22.87%	-0.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.04%	18.47%	+2.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.50%	19.88%	+3.62%