PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLJH vs. OARK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLJH vs. OARK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLJH vs. OARK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
9.29%25.26%25.89%36.02%-7.11%
OARK
YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF
-6.86%20.37%7.32%20.12%-9.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJH achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly higher than OARK's -6.86% return.


FLJH

1D
2.72%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
9.29%
6M
17.51%
1Y
40.53%
3Y*
28.77%
5Y*
18.48%
10Y*

OARK

1D
1.06%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
-6.86%
6M
-13.09%
1Y
32.55%
3Y*
11.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLJH vs. OARK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than OARK's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLJH vs. OARK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJH
FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

OARK
OARK Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
OARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
OARK Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
OARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
OARK Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJH vs. OARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) and YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLJHOARKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

0.99

+0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

1.50

+0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.19

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

1.45

+1.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.34

3.71

+8.63

FLJH vs. OARK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the OARK Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJH and OARK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLJHOARKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

0.99

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.27

+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between FLJH and OARK is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLJH vs. OARK - Dividend Comparison

FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than OARK's 65.84% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
3.57%3.90%5.06%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.10%
OARK
YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF
65.84%61.86%47.86%45.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLJH vs. OARK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJH drawdown since its inception was -31.51%, smaller than the maximum OARK drawdown of -35.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJH and OARK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLJHOARKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.51%

-35.48%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.83%

-23.26%

+11.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.01%

-18.14%

+13.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-10.65%

+5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

9.11%

-5.92%

Volatility

FLJH vs. OARK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) is 7.76%, while YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) has a volatility of 10.21%. This indicates that FLJH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLJHOARKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

10.21%

-2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.50%

22.13%

-7.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.00%

32.96%

-9.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.50%

31.12%

-12.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.90%

31.12%

-11.22%